G R Lokhande & Ors vs Vsb Tilekar & Ors
Judges: B N Agrawal, G S Singhvi
19 March, 2009·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8131 OF 2001 G.R. Lokhande & Ors Appellant(s) Versus V.B. Tilekar & Ors Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties.By the impugned order, the High Court allowed the writ...
Supreme Court Of India
Hongkong and Shanghai Banking ... vs Govt.Of India and Anr
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, V S Sirpurkar
18 March, 2009·V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. The respondent No. 2 herein Mrs. Manju Saxena was the employee of the appellant-Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter called `the bank' for short). According to the appellant, she drew a salary of Rs.58,330/- per month with a total annual rem...
Supreme Court Of India
Rameshwar Dayal Mangla @ Ramesh ... vs Harish Chand and Anr
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, Asok Kumar Ganguly
18 March, 2009·Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court disposing of an appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short `CPC').3. The respondent as plaintiff has filed a sui...
Supreme Court Of India
Mangoo Ram vs State Of J and K and Anr
Judges: B N Agrawal, G S Singhvi
18 March, 2009·On 3rd November, 1998, a Notification under Section 4(1) of the State Land Acquisition Act, 1990 (Act No.X of 1990) (for short, `the Act') enacted by the Legislature of the State of Jammu and Kashmir, was issued for acquiring 50 Kanals 16 Marlas of the land situated in Village Kallar Himati, Tehsil ...
Supreme Court Of India
Canara Bank By Its M D vs Damodhar Govind Idoorkar & Ors
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee
18 March, 2009·REPORTABL EIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1716 OF 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.5387 of 2007) Canara Bank by its M.D. ….AppellantVERSUSDamodhar Govind Idoorkar & Ors. ...Respondents J U D G M E N T TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.1. Leave granted.2. ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of H.P vs Sada Ram And Anr
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, H L Dattu
18 March, 2009·TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.1. Leave granted.2. The High Court, while dismissing the petition, passed the following order :-"CMP No. 224 of 2006 Heard. We do not see any reason to interfere with the judgment of the Tribunal. The petition is dismissed.CMP No. 332 of 2006 In view of the order passed in the ma...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Godrej Sara Lee Ltd vs Asst Commissioner ( Aa ) & Anr
Judges: S B Sinha Sd, Mukundakam Sharma Sd, R M Lodha
18 March, 2009·1. Leave granted.2. Appellant is manufacturer of coils, mats, aerosols, liquids/refills etc. which are used for driving away and destroying mosquitoes. Appellant is an assessee under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, 'the Act'). The assessment year in question is 2005-06.3. The State...
Supreme Court Of India
Sethuraman vs Rajamanickam
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, V S Sirpurkar
18 March, 2009·V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. In these appeals, the common order passed by the Learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court in three Criminal Revisions, is in challenge. By the instant order, the Learned Single Judge set aside the three orders passed by the Trial Court dated 26.7.2004 in C...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Sh Sada Ram & Anr
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, H L Dattu
18 March, 2009·TARUN CHATTERJEE, J.1. Leave granted.2. The High Court, while dismissing the petition, passed the following order :-“CMP No. 224 of 2006 Heard. We do not see any reason to interfere with the judgment of the Tribunal. The petition is dismissed.CMP No. 332 of 2006 In view of the order passed in the m...
Supreme Court Of India
Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp Ltd vs Government Of India & Anr
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, V S Sirpurkar
18 March, 2009·V.S. SIRPURKAR, J.1. Leave granted.2. The respondent No. 2 herein Mrs. Manju Saxena was the employee of the appellant-Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter called ‘the bank’ for short). According to the appellant, she drew a salary of Rs.58,330/- per month with a total an...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.