M. Chandru vs Chennai Metropolitan Dev. Auth. and ...
Judges: S B Sinha, Mukundakam Sharma
17 February, 2009·S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.INTRODUCTION2. Legality and/or validity of Infrastructure Development Charges (IDC) by Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) allegedly on 2 behalf of Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Sewerage Board) for issuing planning permission i...
Supreme Court Of India
Azhar Sultana vs B Rajamani & Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, Cyriac Joseph
17 February, 2009·S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Subsequent purchasers who were arrayed at a later stage in a suit for Specific Performance of Contract are before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 21.12.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Andhra Prades...
Supreme Court Of India
Usha Rajkhowa & Ors vs Paramount Industries & Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, V S Sirpurkar
17 February, 2009·V.S. SIRPURKAR,J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellants herein challenges the judgment passed by the High Court, confirming the judgment of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’ for short), whereby, the Tribunal limited the appellants’ entitlement to 50% of assess...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P vs Z.R. Siddiqui
Judges: Markandey Katju, G S Singhvi
17 February, 2009·Heard learned counsel for the parties.This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgement of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dated 22nd February, 2002.The respondent was the General Manager of Jal Sansthan, Jhansi, at the relevant time and the short question involved in this cas...
Supreme Court Of India
M Chandru vs The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority & Anr
Judges: S B Sinha, Mukundakam Sharma
17 February, 2009·S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.INTRODUCTION2. Legality and/or validity of Infrastructure Development Charges (IDC) by Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) allegedly on behalf of Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Sewerage Board) for issuing planning permissio...
Supreme Court Of India
Madan Mohan Mishra vs Chandrika Pandey ( Dead ) By Lrs
Judges: S B Sinha, Mukundakam Sharma
17 February, 2009·S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether jurisdiction of the Civil Court is barred in respect of grant of a relief for setting aside a deed of gift in terms of Section 49 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (for short, ‘the 1953 Act’) is in question in this appeal. It arises out of a j...
Supreme Court Of India
Deepak Kumar Bansal vs Union Of India & Anr
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, Sirpurkar
17 February, 2009·TARUN CHATTERJEE,J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 25th of May, 2007 passed by a learned Judge of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench in S.B. Arbitration Application No.31 of 2005 by which the learned Judge had rejected the appl...
Supreme Court Of India
Sneh Gupta vs Devi Sarup & Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, Mukundakam Sharma
17 February, 2009·S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is involved in this appeal. It arises out of a judgment and order dated 13.9.2006 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana setting aside an order dated 29.9.2005 pass...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Z R Siddiqui
Judges: Markandey Katju, G S Singhvi
17 February, 2009·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7705 OF 2002 State of Uttar Pradesh ...Appellant(s) Versus Z.R. Siddiqui ...Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties.This appeal has been filed against the imp...
Supreme Court Of India
Martin F D’Souza - vs - Mohd Ishfaq
Judges: Markandey Katju, R M Lodha
17 February, 2009·MARKANDEY KATJU, J.1. This appeal against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi dated 22.3.2002 has been filed under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.3. The brief facts of the case...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.