Boby Mathew vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Aftab Alam
27 August, 2009·We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. Several reasons have been advanced by the High Court to indicate that the chain of circumstances against the appellant were complete. These circumstances are:(I) close acquaintance of deceased and the accused including visiting each others houses du...
Supreme Court Of India
Lokprakashan Ltd vs Kanchanbhai Kanbhai Tadvi & OthersThe Sandesh Limited vs Rameshchandra Babulal Shah & Others
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Harjit Singh Bedi
27 August, 2009·Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. These appeals are directed against the judgment and final order dated 15.6.2001 of the High Court of Gujarat passed in Special Civil Application No.723 of 2000 along with Special Civil Application Nos.2994 and 6470 of 1999.2. As the common question of law is involved in these ...
Supreme Court Of India
Warehousing & Cold Storage G E I Ltd & Anr vs Board Of Trustees, Port Of Calcutta & Ors
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, Aftab Alam, R M Lodha
27 August, 2009·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7139 OF 2004 WAREHOUSING & COLD STORAGE G.E.I.LTD. & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PORT OF CALCUTTA & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.5158/2005 O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NO.7139 OF 2004:Having heard learned...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra and Anr vs M/S Super Max ...
Judges: B N Agrawal, G S Singhvi, Aftab Alam
27 August, 2009·AFTAB ALAM, J.1. Leave granted.2. The Government of Maharashtra, the appellant before us, is in occupation of an area of 9000 sq. ft. (11,050 sq. ft. as per the affidavit-in- 2 reply filed by the appellant) comprising the sixth floor of a building on a monthly rental of Rs. 5236.58/-, besides water ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jarnail Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, B S Chauhan
26 August, 2009·Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 31st August, 2005 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing their appeals and affirming the conviction and sentence awarded by the Trial Court vide its judgment and order dated 8.1.2004...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra vs Vijayprakash -
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Aftab Alam
26 August, 2009·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1514 OF 2009 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..... APPELLANT VERSUS VIJAYPRAKASH ..... RESPONDENT -O R D E R We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.The High Court has in paragraph 14 of its judgm...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan vs Naresh @ Ram Naresh
Judges: Dalveer Bhandari, Mukundakam Sharma
26 August, 2009·Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.1. This criminal appeal is filed by the State of Rajasthan being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the Rajasthan High Court on 18.07.2001 acquitting the respondent – accused from the charges under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referre...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P vs Ram Prasad And Ors
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Aftab Alam
26 August, 2009·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 535 OF 2004 STATE OF U.P. ..... APPELLANT VERSUS RAM PRASAD AND ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS O R D E R It is true that the judgment of the High Court is rather sketchy and does not really take into account...
Supreme Court Of India
C R 80 Tameezuddin @ Tammu vs State Of
Judges:
26 August, 2009·[2009] 14 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 80 TAMEEZUDDIN @ TAMMUv.STATE OF (NCT) OF DELHI (Criminal Appeal No.1289 of 2004) AUGUST 26, 2009[Harjit singh bedi and Aftab Alam, JJ.]The following Order of the Court was delivered O R D E R The appellant herein, Tameezuddin, was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC by t...
Supreme Court Of India
Tameezuddin @ Tammu vs State Of (Nct) Of Delhi
Judges: Harjit Singh Bedi, Aftab Alam
26 August, 2009·The appellant herein, Tameezuddin, was convicted under Section 376 of the IPC by the Court of Sessions and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 84 months and a fine of Rs.14,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for six months and under Section 506 (ii) of the IPC, to a sentence o...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.