Gajraj Yadav vs Rajendra Singh @ Deena and Ors
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma
24 October, 2008·Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in these appeals is to the order passed by a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court directing suspension of sentence awarded to the respondents. It was directed that such suspension was to take effect on each one of them by furnishing a bond in...
Supreme Court Of India
R Kalyani vs Janak C Mehta & Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, Aftab Alam
24 October, 2008·S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant lodged a First Information Report (FIR) against the respondents on or about 4.1.2003 under Sections 409, 420 and 468 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.3. First and second respondent approached the High Court for an order for quashing of the sai...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Haryana & Ors vs Shakuntla Devi
Judges: S B Sinha, Cyriac Joseph
24 October, 2008·S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether the respondents being dependents of the deceased ad hoc appointees are entitled to grant of ‘family pension’ in terms of the provisions of Punjab Civil Services Rules (for short, ‘the Rules’) and Family Pension Scheme, 1964 (For short, ‘the 1964 Scheme) is t...
Supreme Court Of India
M P Housing Board vs Shiv Shankar Mandil & OrsState Of M P & Ors vs Shiv Shankar Mandil & Anr
Judges: Lokeshwar Singh Panta, V S Sirpurkar
24 October, 2008·“REPORTABLE”IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3840-3841 OF 2001M.P. Housing Board …. Appellant Versus Shiv Shankar Mandil & Ors. …. RespondentsWithCIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3842-3843 OF 2001 State of M.P. & Ors. …...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Andhra Pradesh — ( S ) vs M Madhusudhan Rao — ( S )
Judges: D K Jain
24 October, 2008·D.K. JAIN, J.:Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the judgment and final order dated 12th April, 2006 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad, setting aside the conviction of the respondent–accused A-1 in Sessions Case No.129 of 1998 from the charge of offence punishable ...
Supreme Court Of India
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Mayawati & Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, Cyriac Joseph
24 October, 2008·Leave granted.Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal having found that the driver of the vehicle in question did not possess an effective and valid licence and, therefore, while directing the appellant to pay the amount to the claimants on the premise t...
Supreme Court Of India
Somon vs State Of Kerala
Judges: D K Jain
24 October, 2008·REPORTABLEIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1693 OF 2008 ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO. 7995 OF 2007 SOMON … APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF KERALA … RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T C.K. THAKKER, J.1. Leave granted.2. The prese...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra — ( S ) vs Ahmed Shaikh Babajan & — ( S ) Ors
Judges: C K Thakker, D K Jain
24 October, 2008·D.K. JAIN, J.:1. The State of Maharashtra has preferred these five appeals, by special leave, against the common judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, in Criminal Appeals No.240, 241, 273, 381 of 1995 and Criminal Revision No.156 of 1995. By the impugned order the ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Everest Holding Ltd vs Shyam Kumar Shrivastava & Ors
Judges: Mukundakam Sharma
24 October, 2008·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITON NO. 13 OF 2007 M/s. Everest Holding Ltd. …. Petitioner Versus Shyam Kumar Shrivastava & Ors. …. Respondents O R D E R Dr. MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, J.1. This Order would dispose of the petition...
Supreme Court Of India
Chinnakarupathal & Ors vs A D Sundarabai & Ors
Judges: R V Raveendran
24 October, 2008·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5267-69 OF 2002 Chinnakarupathal & Ors. … Appellants Vs.A.D.Sundarabai & Ors. … Respondents J U D G M E N T R.V.RAVEENDRAN, J.One Ammasai Gounder filed a suit against A.T.Krishnasami...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.