A.P. Electricity Regulatory ... vs M/S. R.V.K. Energy Pvt. Ltd. and Anr
Judges: S B Sinha, D K Jain
16 May, 2008·S.B. SINHA, J.Interpretation and/or application of the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 (for short the 1998 Act) vis-a-vis the orders passed by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (for short `the Commission') are involved in these appeals which arise ou...
Supreme Court Of India
Balbir Kaur and Anr vs U.P.Sec.Edu.Service Selection ...
Judges: K G Balakrishnan, R V Raveendran, D K Jain
16 May, 2008·(Arising out of SLP(C) No.19779 of 2003) Civil Appeal No. 3808 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.19780 of 2003) Civil Appeal No. 3809 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.20860 of 2003) Civil Appeal Nos. 3810-3811 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.20877-20878 of 2003 Civil Appeal No. 3812 of 2008 (Aris...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Anadromeda Foundation India ... vs D.G.H.S. and Ors
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi
16 May, 2008·HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court which, while exercising its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, has dismissed the Writ Petition questioning the validity 2 of the order dated 9th December 1997 i...
Supreme Court Of India
Ranganayakamma and Anr vs K.S. Prakash (D) By Lrs. and Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, Lokeshwar Singh Panta
16 May, 2008·S.B. SINHA, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21st September, 2005 passed by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court in R.F.A. No. 605 of 1997 dismissing an appeal preferred from the judgment and decree dated 27th May, 1997 passed by the XII Addi...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P. and Ors vs M/S. Swadeshi Plytex Ltd. and Ors
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi
16 May, 2008·HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent No.1, M/s. Swadeshi Polytex Limited (hereinafter referred to as "SPL") a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and presently a sick unit has its registered Office at Kavi Nagar, Industrial Area, 2 Ghaziabad. Concededly approximately 33% o...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajeshwar Thakur and Anr vs Bihar State Electricity Board and ...
Judges: P P Naolekar, Lokeshwar Singh Panta
16 May, 2008·S.B. SINHA, J :1. Leave granted.2. These appeals at the instance of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (for short "the Board") and State of Tamil Nadu are directed against a judgment and order dated 19.07.2005 passed by a Division Bench of the Madras High Court dismissing the writ appeals filed by the...
Supreme Court Of India
Dlf Universal Ltd. and Anr vs Dir. General Investigation ...
Judges: S B Sinha, Lokeshwar Singh Panta
16 May, 2008·Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. M/s DLF Universal Limited (first appellant herein) and DLF Qutab Enclave Complex Educational Education Charitable Trust (second appellant herein) have filed this appeal under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 [hereinafter referred to a...
Supreme Court Of India
Chennai Customs Appraising ... vs Union Of India and Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, V S Sirpurkar
16 May, 2008·S.B. SINHA, J :1. Leave granted.2. Interpretation of the Customs Appraisers' Service, Class II Recruitment Rules, 1961 (for short "the 1961 Rules") and the 2 Department of Revenue (Customs Appraisers) Recruitment Rules, 1988 (for short "the 1988 Rules") vis-`-vis application of the decisions of this...
Supreme Court Of India
Lattu Mahto and Anr vs State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta
16 May, 2008·judgment of the trial court and the High Court.6. Reason is the heartbeat of every conclusion, and without the same it becomes lifeless. (See Raj Kishore Jha v. State of Bihar and Ors. (2003 (7) SCC 152).7. Even in respect of administrative orders Lord Denning M.R. in Breen v. Amalgamated Engineerin...
Supreme Court Of India
Bank Of India vs Ketan Parekh & Ors
Judges: A K Mathur
16 May, 2008·A.K. MATHUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.1.2006 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court whereby the Division Bench has held that since the property of the respondent No.1 has been seized under the Special Courts( Trial of Offences Relating...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.