Supintd. Of Police,Karnataka L. and ... vs B. Srinivas
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma
18 August, 2008·Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court accepting the petition filed by the respondent under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the `Code'). Prayer in the petition was to qu...
Supreme Court Of India
Northn. Rly. Admn., Min.Of ... vs Patel Engineering Company Ltd
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, P Sathasivam, Aftab Alam
18 August, 2008·1. Leave granted in all the Special Leave Petitions2. Noticing two different views in two decisions of this Court in Ace Pipeline Contracts (P) Ltd. v. Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. (2007 (5) SCC 304) and Union of India v. Bharat Battery Mfg. Co. (P) Ltd. (2007 (7) SCC 684) the matter has been referr...
Supreme Court Of India
Namdeo vs Tukaram
Judges: R V Raveendran, P Sathasivam
18 August, 2008·Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant and respondent are respectively the plaintiff and defendant in a suit for permanent injunction.2. The appellant's prayer in the suit was to restrain the respondent from interfering with his possession of agricultural field S.No.131/...
Supreme Court Of India
Northern Railway Administration, Ministry Of Railway, New Delhi vs Patel Engineering Company Ltd
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, P Sathasivam, Aftab Alam
18 August, 2008·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5067 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) NO. 16196 of 2006) Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, New Delhi …Appellant Versus Patel Engineering Company Ltd. …Respondent With (Civil...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Vadodara-I vs M/S Gujarat Carbon & Industries Ltd
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma
18 August, 2008·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1618 OF 2005 Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara-I ….Appellant Versus M/s Gujarat Carbon & Industries Ltd. Respondents WITH Civil Appeal No. 1077 of 2006 Civil Appeal No. 1173 of 2006 Civil Appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Executive Engineer, D Vsv Nigam vs M/S Real Cement Company Pvt Ltd & Anr
Judges: B N Agrawal, G S Singhvi, J M Panchal
18 August, 2008·IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5780 OF 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.17792 of 2006) Executive Engineer, D.V.V. Nigam ...Appellant(s) Versus M/s. Real Cement Company Pvt. Ltd. & Anr Respondent(s) O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the parties....
Supreme Court Of India
Swaran Singh & Ors ( S ) - vs - State Through Standing Counsel & Anr ( S )
Judges: Altamas Kabir, Markandey Katju
18 August, 2008·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1287_OF 2008 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 987 of 2007] Swaran Singh & Ors. .. Appellant (s) -versus-State through Standing Counsel & Anr. .. Respondent (s) J ...
Supreme Court Of India
Superintendent Of Police, Karnataka Lokayuktha And Anr vs B Srinivas
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, Mukundakam Sharma
18 August, 2008·REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICITON CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1289 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1585 of 2007) Superintendent of Police, Karnataka …Appellants Lokayuktha and Anr.Versus B. Srinivas …Respondent JUDGMENT Dr. ARIJIT P...
Supreme Court Of India
A Chowgule & Co Ltd vs Goa Foundation & Ors
Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, Harjit Singh Bedi
18 August, 2008·HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J.1. The facts leading to the filing of this appeal are as under:2. The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, has its registered office at Chowgule House, Mormugao Harbour,Goa and is a recognized star trading house engaged in the mining, processing and ex...
Supreme Court Of India
Dinesh Seth vs State Of N C T Of
Judges: Altamas Kabir, G S Singhvi
18 August, 2008·G.S. Singhvi, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of Delhi High Court whereby the appellant was acquitted of the charge under Section 304B Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) but was convicted under Section 498A IPC and sentenced to three years’ rigorous imprisonment.2. The facts(i) Th...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.