Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Judges: Arijit Pasayat, R V Raveendran

30 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T RAVEENDRAN, J.This is a plaintiff's appeal against the judgment dated 19.9.2002 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in Regular Second Appeal No.3689 of 2002 confirming the judgment and decree of the first appellate court dated 6.8.2002 allowing defendant's appeal and dismissing the pl...

Judges: Ruma Pal, P P Naolekar

30 January, 2006·JUDGMENT [arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 17906 of 2004] P.P. NAOLEKAR, J. :Leave granted.This appeal is preferred by the plaintiff-appellants challenging the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court dated 23.8.2004 whereby the plaintiffs' suit filed in Admiralty j...

Judges: Arun Kumar, Dalveer Bhandari

27 January, 2006·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1600 of 2005 PETITIONER:The Workmen of Bhurkunda Colliery of M/s Central Coalfields Ltd.RESPONDENT:The Management of Bhurkunda Colliery of M/s Central Coalfields Ltd. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/01/2006 BENCH:Arun Kumar & Dalveer Bhandari JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T WITH CIVIL APPEAL N...

Judges: H K Sema, Ar Lakshmanan

27 January, 2006·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1337-1340 of 2005 PETITIONER:Sandvik Asia Ltd.RESPONDENT:Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Pune & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/01/2006 BENCH:H.K. Sema & Dr. AR. Lakshmanan JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.These appeals raise substantial and important questions of law o...

Judges: Arun Kumar, Dalveer Bhandari

27 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1601 OF 2005 Employers in relation to the Management of Bhurkunda Colliery of M/s Central Coalfields Ltd., Ranchi .... Appellant Versus Their Workmen represented by the General Secretary, Koyla Mazdoor Sabha, Bhurkunda Bazar, Ranchi ....Respondent Dalveer Bhanda...

Judges: S B Sinha, P P Naolekar

25 January, 2006·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6319 of 2004 PETITIONER:The Commissioner of Police and Ors.RESPONDENT:Syed Hussain DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/01/2006 BENCH:S.B. Sinha & P.P. Naolekar JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT ORDER This appeal is directed against the order dated 7.8.2003 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of ...

Judges: H Sema, A Lakshmanan

25 January, 2006·JUDGMENT H.K. Sema, J.Page 22981. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital dated 5.8.2004 confirming the order of the trial court convicting the five appellants under Sections 149, 302/149 IPC and a fine of Rs. 10,000/-; in default two yea...

Judges: Arijit Pasayat, S H Kapadia J U D G M E N T Arising Out Of Slpc No 26572 Of 2004 Arijit Pasayat J Leave Granted Challenge In This Appeal Is To The Order Passed By A Division Bench Of The Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Nagpur The Respondent Had Secured Employment In The Life Insurance Corporation Of India Hereinafter Referred To As The Lic The Appellant In This Appeal On The Basis That He Belongs To Scheduled Tribe Undisputedly His Caste Was Recorded As Halba Committee For Scrutiny And Verification Of Tribe Claims Amaravati Vide Its Order Dated 30 4 2004 Held That Respondent S Claim Of Belonging To Scheduled Tribe Was Wrong Unfounded And Was A Fraudulent Claim The Order Was Questioned By Respondent Before The High Court By Filing A Writ Petition Before The High Court Learned Counsel For The Writ Petitioner Submitted That The Writ Petitioner Was Willing To File An Undertaking To The Effect That He Will Not Claim Any Benefit On The Basis Of His Case As Halba Either In His Service Or Anywhere Else At Any Time For Himself As Well As For His Legal Heirs With Reference To A Judgment Of This Court In State Of Maharashtra V Milind And Ors 20011 Scc 4 The High Court Held That In View Of The Undertaking The Writ Petitioner S Services Were Not To Be Terminated Notwithstanding Invalidation Order Passed By The Scrutiny Committee Learned Counsel For The Lic Submitted That The Approach Of The High Court Is Clearly Erroneous In Milind S Case Supra This Court Never Laid Down Any Principle Of Law Having Universal Application The Observations In Para 38 Of The Judgment Were Limited To The Peculiar Facts Of The Case The High Court Erroneously Proceeded On The Basis That The Decision Laid Down A Rule Of Universal Application In Response Learned Counsel For The Respondent Submitted That The Respondent Had Already Rendered About 14 Years Of Uninterrupted And Blemishless Service And Merely Because He Could Not Establish His Scheduled Tribe Claim The Benefit Already Granted Should Not Have Been Withdrawn It Was Pointed Out That Undertaking In The Lines Noted By The High Court Had Already Been Filed This Court In R Vishwanatha Pillai V State Of Kerala And Others 20042 Scc 105 And Lillykutty V Scrutiny Committee Sc, St And Others 20058 Scc 283 Have Considered The Effect Of Non Genuine Certificates In The

23 January, 2006·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 719 of 2006 PETITIONER:L.I.C. of India RESPONDENT:Sushil DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2006 BENCH:ARIJIT PASAYAT & S.H. KAPADIA @ J U D G M E N T (Arising out Of SLP(C) No.26572 of 2004) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Leave granted.Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a Division B...

Judges: H K Sema, Ar Lakshmanan

23 January, 2006·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 623 of 2005 PETITIONER:Chairman-cum-M.D., T.N.C.S. Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.RESPONDENT:K. Meerabai DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2006 BENCH:H.K. Sema & Dr. AR. Lakshmanan JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.The present appeal was preferred against the final judgment and order...

Judges: Ashok Bhan, S H Kapadia

20 January, 2006·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 4391-4392 of 2000 PETITIONER:M/s Motor Industries Co. Ltd.RESPONDENT:Commissioner of Central Excise,Aurangabad. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/01/2006 BENCH:ASHOK BHAN & S.H. KAPADIA JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T KAPADIA, J.The short question which arises for determination in these civil ap...