Shanti G. Patel and Ors vs State Of Maharashtra and Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, P K Balasubramanyan
31 January, 2006·JUDGMENT O R D E R The petitioners herein before the High Court, inter alia, sought for issuance of a writ of or in the nature of mandamus declaring Section 37(1AA) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (for short, 'the MRTP Act') as violative of the Constitution of India and Items...
Supreme Court Of India
Syndicate Bank and Ors vs Venkatesh Gururao Kurati
Judges: H K Sema, Dr A R Lakshmanan
31 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T H.K.SEMA,J This appeal, preferred by Syndicate Bank is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 16th April, 2004 passed by the Division Bench in Writ Appeal No.7997 of 1999 affirming the order dated 14th June, 1999 of the learned Single Judge passed in Writ Petition No. 12594 of...
Supreme Court Of India
Govt. Of A.P. and Ors vs Mohd. Narsullah Khan
Judges: H K Sema, Dr A R Lakshmanan
31 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T H.K.SEMA,J This appeal, preferred by the State of Andhra Pradesh, is directed against the judgment and order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh dated 9.12.2003 in Writ Petition No. 14146 of 2003 quashing the order of dismissal dated 21.9.2000 of the respondent ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commnr.andSecretary; To Govt vs N. Govindan Achary And Ors
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, C K Thakker
31 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T [With Civil Appeal Nos. 381-382 of 2002] The Commissioner and Secretary ....Appellant to Government, Transport Department, Fort. St. George, Madras ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.These appeals are directed against the judgment of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, Madras (in short the 'Tribu...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka and Ors vs C. Lalitha
Judges: S B Sinha, P P Naolekar
31 January, 2006·JUDGMENT S.B. SINHA, J.Construction of an inter-parties order of this Court is in question in this appeal wherein the validity of an amendment of the reservation policy of the State which was the subject matter of a decision of this Court in N.T. Devin Katti and Others v. Karnataka Public Service Co...
Supreme Court Of India
L.K. Verma vs H.M.T. Ltd. and Anr
Judges: S B Sinha, P K Balasubramanyan
31 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.22516 of 2004] S.B. SINHA, J : .Leave granted.The Appellant was employed by the Respondent herein as a Safety Officer. On an allegation that he had committed acts of misconduct, he was placed under suspension. He preferred an appeal before the Labour...
Supreme Court Of India
Tanaji Ramchandra Nimhan vs Swati Vinayak Nimhan and Ors
Judges: S B Sinha, P K Balasubramanyan
31 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T ( @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 22355 OF 2004) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO 886 OF 2006 ( @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 23763 OF 2004) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CITY OF PUNE & ANR. Appellants Versus SWATI VINAYAK NIMHAN & ORS. Respondents P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.Leave granted.1....
Supreme Court Of India
Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd vs M/S Jain Studios Limited
Judges: C K Thakker
31 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T C.K. THAKKER, J.This Arbitration Petition is filed by the petitioner, Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. against the respondent, M/s Jain Studios Ltd. under sub-section (6) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). It is prayed in...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Bailamma @ Doddabailamma ... vs Poornaprajna House Building ...
Judges: B P Singh, Arun Kumar
31 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T WITH Civil Appeal Nos. 2016-2023 of 1999 Sri M. Kondandaraju and others Appellants Versus The State of Karnataka and others Respondents AND Civil Appeal Nos. 2073-2077 of 2000 Smt. Muthamma etc. etc. Appellants Versus State of Karnataka and others Respondents B.P. SINGH, J.Thes...
Supreme Court Of India
The Regional Provident Fund ... vs M/S Central Aercanut and Coca ...
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, R V Raveendran
30 January, 2006·J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court affirming the judgment of the learned Single Judge. Both the learned Single Judge and the Division Bench held that 45 persons who were selected as trainees were not covered b...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.