Sanganagouda A. Veeranagouda And ... vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: H Sema, P Naolekar
29 September, 2005·JUDGMENT H.K. Sema, J.Page 8691. Heard the parties.2. Six accused all police personnel, A1 Sanganagouda Ayyanagouda Veeranagouda, Sub-Inspector of Police and A2 Chandrappa Basappa Komara, A3 Basavaraj Kadiyappa Aramani, A4 Kalakappa Gulappa Hosamani, A5 Eswarappa Rainappa Gowari, A6 Virupakshappa Sh...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U P vs Swadeshi Polytax Ltd, Ghaziabad
Judges: S N Variava, Tarun Chatterjee
28 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 3742 of 2000 PETITIONER:Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P.RESPONDENT:Swadeshi Polytax Ltd., Ghaziabad DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/09/2005 BENCH:S.N. Variava & Tarun Chatterjee JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT S.N. VARIAVA, J.This appeal is against the Judgment dated 13th October, 1998 passed by the A...
Supreme Court Of India
Common Cause ’A Registered Society, Etc vs Union Of India & Ors, Etc
Judges: Ar Lakshmanan, S H Kapadia
28 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Contempt Petition (civil) 81 of 2000 PETITIONER:Common Cause ’A Registered Society, Etc.RESPONDENT:Union of India & Ors., Etc DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/09/2005 BENCH:S. N. Variava,Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & S. H. Kapadia JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT O R D E R CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 81 OF 2000 IN W.P. (C) NO. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Arvind Kumar Saxena vs Brij Raj Kishore Ranga & Ors
Judges: B N Srikrishna, C K Thakker
28 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5930 of 2005 PETITIONER:Arvind Kumar Saxena RESPONDENT:Brij Raj Kishore Ranga & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/09/2005 BENCH:B. N. Srikrishna & C. K. Thakker JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT O R D E R (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 5389 of 2004) with Civil Appeal No. 5931/2005 @ S.L.P. (C) No. 5...
Supreme Court Of India
Gurmeet Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: K G Balakrishnan, Arun Kumar
28 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1371 of 2004 PETITIONER:Gurmeet Singh RESPONDENT:State of Uttar Pradesh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/09/2005 BENCH:K.G. Balakrishnan & Arun Kumar JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARUN KUMAR, J.The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court upholding h...
Supreme Court Of India
Air India Ltd & Ors vs Vishal Capoor & Ors
Judges: Ar Lakshmanan, C K Thakker
28 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5919 of 2005 PETITIONER:Air India Ltd. & Ors.RESPONDENT:Vishal Capoor & Ors.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/09/2005 BENCH:Ruma Pal,Dr. AR.Lakshmanan & C.K. Thakker JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP ( C ) No. 8258 of 2005) WITH C.A. Nos .5936 & 5920 of 2005 @SLP (C ) Nos. 2038...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Uttar Pradesh & Anr vs Brijpal Singh
Judges: Ar Lakshmanan, R V Raveendran
27 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5910 of 2005 PETITIONER:State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.RESPONDENT:Brijpal Singh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/09/2005 BENCH:Ruma Pal,Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & R.V. Raveendran JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 182 OF 2003) Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.Leave granted.This app...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Kanda Gopaludu
Judges: H K Sema, P P Naolekar
27 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1018 of 1998 PETITIONER:State of Andhra Pradesh RESPONDENT:Kanda Gopaludu DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/09/2005 BENCH:H.K. Sema & P.P. Naolekar JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT SEMA, J.The respondent was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 IPC. The trial court relying upon the extrajudicia...
Supreme Court Of India
M M Bilaney & Anr vs Fali Rustomji Kumana
Judges: Arun Kumar, A K Mathur
27 September, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5162 of 2002 PETITIONER:M.M.Bilaney & Anr.RESPONDENT:Fali Rustomji Kumana DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/09/2005 BENCH:ARUN KUMAR & A.K. MATHUR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T A.K. MATHUR, J.This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High ...
Supreme Court Of India
Chakravarthy vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: H Sema, P Naolekar
27 September, 2005·JUDGMENT H.K. Sema, J.1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court dismissing the writ petition.3. The detenu challenged the order of the detention passed on 17th March, 2003. The period of detention is for 12 months. Te...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.