Calcutta Municipal Corporation & Others vs M/S Shrey Mercantile Pvt Ltd &Others
Judges: S N Variava, Ar Lakshmanan, S H Kapadia
09 March, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5631 of 2000 PETITIONER:Calcutta Municipal Corporation & Others RESPONDENT:M/s Shrey Mercantile Pvt.Ltd.&Others DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/03/2005 BENCH:S.N. VARIAVA & Dr. AR. LAKSHMANAN & S.H. KAPADIA JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.6121 OF 2000 State of West Bengal ...
Supreme Court Of India
K Venkatachala Bhat And Anr vs Krishna Nayak ( D ) By Lrs And Ors
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, S H Kapadia
09 March, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1604 of 2005 PETITIONER:K. Venkatachala Bhat and Anr.RESPONDENT:Krishna Nayak (D) by Lrs. And Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/03/2005 BENCH:Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Leave granted.By the impugned judgment a Division Bench of the Karnataka Hig...
Supreme Court Of India
Ghodawat Pan Masala Products (I) ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Judges: Y Sabharwal, P Naolekar
07 March, 2005·ORDER In S.L.P.(C) No. 19097/2002:1. Leave granted.2. The challenge before the High Court in the writ petition filed by the appellants was to the constitutional validity of Section 3(B) of the Maharashtra Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987 (for short, 'Maharashtra Act'). The said provision is in pari-materia...
Supreme Court Of India
Kirloskar Brothers Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Pune
Judges: Ruma Pal, Arijit Pasayat, C K Thakker
07 March, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6938 of 1999 PETITIONER:Kirloskar Brothers Ltd.RESPONDENT:Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/03/2005 BENCH:Ruma Pal & Arijit Pasayat & C.K. Thakker JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by the ...
Supreme Court Of India
The Commissioner, Trade Tax U P vs S/S National Cereal Product
Judges: Ruma Pal Arijit Pasayat, C K Thakker
07 March, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6221 of 1999 PETITIONER:The Commissioner, Trade Tax. U.P.RESPONDENT:S/S National Cereal Product DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/03/2005 BENCH:Ruma Pal, Arijit Pasayat & C.K. Thakker JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T WITH CA. Nos. 6222- 6225/1999 CA No. 4313/2001, CA Nos \005\005\005\005..of 2005...
Supreme Court Of India
Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board vs Jagdish Chandra Sharma
Judges: N Santosh Hegde Tarun Chatterjee, P K Balasubramanyan
04 March, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1339-1340 of 2003 PETITIONER:Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board RESPONDENT:Jagdish Chandra Sharma DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/03/2005 BENCH:N. SANTOSH HEGDE, TARUN CHATTERJEE & P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.1. The appeal C.A. No. 1339 of 2003 is...
Supreme Court Of India
Devalsab ( Dead ) By Lrs vs Ibrahimsab F Karajagi & Anr
Judges: Ashok Bhan, A K Mathur
04 March, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5628 of 1999 PETITIONER:Devalsab (Dead) By LRs.RESPONDENT:Ibrahimsab F.Karajagi & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/03/2005 BENCH:ASHOK BHAN & A.K. MATHUR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T A.K. MATHUR, J.This appeal is directed against an order passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court...
Supreme Court Of India
Ravi Kumar vs State Of Punjab
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, S H Kapadia
04 March, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 377 of 2005 PETITIONER:Ravi Kumar RESPONDENT:State of Punjab DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/03/2005 BENCH:Arijit Pasayat & S.H. Kapadia JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Leave granted.Appellant calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Punjab and H...
Supreme Court Of India
M.P Elec. Board vs Jagdish Chandra Sharma
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, Tarun Chatterjee, P K Balasubramanyan
04 March, 2005·J U D G M E N T P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, J.1. The appeal C.A. No. 1339 of 2003 is by the employer. C.A. No. 1340 of 2003 is by the employee. The employee was working as a muster roll labourer in the employer-Organization. On 19.01.1984, while in employment, he allegedly physically assaulted a superior ...
Supreme Court Of India
Karnataka State Rd Trans. ... vs S.G.KotturappaandAnr
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, S B Sinha
03 March, 2005·J U D G M E N T W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.4869 OF 1999 S.B. SINHA, J :INTRODUCTION :The Respondents were appointed as Badli Conductors by the Appellant herein. Their services having been found to be not satisfactory were terminated by an order dated 11.11.1983 and 9.9.1980 respectively. Industrial dis...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.