Fatima Riswana vs State Rep. By A.C.P., Chennai and Ors
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, S B Sinha
11 January, 2005·J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP (Crl) Nos.1518-1519 of 2004) Criminal Appeal Nos. 61-62 of 2005 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.)Nos.1518-1519 of 2004 With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2005 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No. 1606 of 2004) SANTOSH HEGDE, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.Leave granted.The ...
Supreme Court Of India
Pu Myllai Hlychho and Ors vs State Of Mizoram and Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti Cji, S V Patil, K G Balakrishnan, B N Srikrishna, G P Mathur
11 January, 2005·JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY:K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, J.K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J.The provisions of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution have evolved a separate scheme for the administration of the tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura through the institution of District Councils or Regional Councils...
Supreme Court Of India
Pumyl.Hly.andOrs.; vs Stat.MizoramandOrs.;
Judges: Cji R C Lahoti, Shivaraj V Patil, K G Balakrishnan, B N Srikrishna
11 January, 2005·J U D G M E N T K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J.The provisions of the Sixth Schedule to the Constitution have evolved a separate scheme for the administration of the tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura through the institution of District Councils or Regional Councils. These councils are veste...
Supreme Court Of India
Jamshed N.Guzdar vs State Of Maharashtra and Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti Cji, S V Patil, K G Balakrishnan, B N Srikrishna, G P Mathur
11 January, 2005·JUDGMENT WITH Civil Appeal No. 2529 of 1992 Civil Appeal No. 2530 of 1992 Transfer Case (Civil) Nos. 8-11 of 1989 Civil Appeal Nos. 1222-1224 of 1985 DELIVERED BY:S.V.PATIL,J.Shivaraj V. Patil J.The Constitutional validity of the Bombay City Civil Court and Bombay Court of Small Causes (Enhancement ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jamshed N.Guzdar vs State Of Maharashtra and Ors
Judges: Cji, Shivaraj V Patil, K G Balakrishnan, B N Srikrishna
11 January, 2005·J U D G M E N T WI TH Civil Appeal No. 2529 of 1992 Bombay Civil and Sessions Court Bar Association ... Appellant Versus Jamshed N. Guzdar & others ... Respondents WI TH Civil Appeal No. 2530 of 1992 The State of Maharashtra ... Appellant Versus Jamshed N. Guzdar & others ... Respondents WI TH Trans...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Bihar vs Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan
Judges: S N Variava, Dr Ar Lakshmanan, S H Kapadia
11 January, 2005·J U D G M E N T KAPADIA, J.The main question in these appeals by grant of special leave relates to the legislative competence of the State Legislature in redefining the word "intoxicant" in section 2(12a) of the Bihar Excise Act, 1915 (hereinafter referred to for the sake of brevity as "the Bihar Ac...
Supreme Court Of India
V. Radhakrishna Reddy vs State Of A.P
Judges: B P Singh, Arun Kumar
11 January, 2005·J U D G M E N T B.P.Singh,J.Delay condoned.Application for substitution is allowed.In this appeal by special appeal the judgment and order of the High Court of judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad dated 20th November, 1998 in Criminal Appeal No.196/94 has been challenged.The High Court by its i...
Supreme Court Of India
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan And ... vs S.C. Sharma
Judges: A Pasayat, S Kapadia
11 January, 2005·JUDGMENT Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. Appellants call in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the appellant's writ petition CWP No. 2965 CAT of 2003. Appellants had questioned ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Hindu Religious and ... vs P Shanmugama and Ors
Judges: Shivaraj V Patil, B N Srikrishna
10 January, 2005·J U D G M E N T Srikrishna, J.One Ponnu Iyer alias Viruddeswara Sivacharya had purchased large extent of land and properties. One of such properties was Door no.278, West Car Street, Tirunelveli. In 1960 the second respondent who was Madathipathi of "Meda Madam" and the Kartha of family filed O.A. N...
Supreme Court Of India
Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: Cji R C Lahoti G P Mathur, P P Naolekar
10 January, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 44 of 2005 PETITIONER:Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal RESPONDENT:State of Tamil Nadu DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/01/2005 BENCH:CJI R. C. Lahoti, G. P. Mathur & P.P. Naolekar JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 6192 OF 2004) G.P. MATHUR, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.