Balwan Singh vs State Of Haryana
Judges: B P Singh, Arun Kumar
27 April, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1245 of 1999 PETITIONER:BALWAN SINGH RESPONDENT:STATE OF HARYANA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/04/2005 BENCH:B.P. SINGH & ARUN KUMAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P.Singh,J.The sole appellant before us Balwan Singh has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Saci Allied Products Ltd, U P vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Meerut
Judges: Ar Lakshmanan, S H Kapadia
26 April, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5854 of 1999 PETITIONER:M/s SACI Allied Products Ltd.,U.P.RESPONDENT:Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2005 BENCH:S.N. Variava, Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & S.H. Kapadia JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.This appeal is preferred against the F...
Supreme Court Of India
Bijay Kumar Saraogi vs State Of Jharkhand
Judges: B P Singh, Arun Kumar
26 April, 2005·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 848 of 1999 PETITIONER:BIJAY KUMAR SARAOGI RESPONDENT:STATE OF JHARKHAND DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2005 BENCH:B.P. SINGH & ARUN KUMAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P.Singh,J.We have heard counsel for the parti...
Supreme Court Of India
K Kandasamy & Anr vs K P M V P Chandrasekaran
Judges: B P Singh, Arun Kumar
26 April, 2005·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1139 of 1999 PETITIONER:K. KANDASAMY & ANR RESPONDENT:K.P.M.V.P. CHANDRASEKARAN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2005 BENCH:B.P. SINGH & ARUN KUMAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P.Singh,J.This matter has been settled ...
Supreme Court Of India
Manmatha Nath Ghosh & Ors vs Baidyanath Mukherjee & Ors
Judges: K G Balakrishnan, B N Srikrishna
26 April, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1449 of 2000 PETITIONER:Manmatha Nath Ghosh & Ors.RESPONDENT:Baidyanath Mukherjee & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2005 BENCH:K.G.Balakrishnan & B.N.Srikrishna JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T SRIKRISHNA, J.This appeal by special leave impugns the judgment of the Special Bench of five ...
Supreme Court Of India
Hari Chand And Others vs Faridabad Complex Administration & Others
Judges: Ruma Pal, C K Thakker
26 April, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2845 of 2005 PETITIONER:Hari Chand and Others RESPONDENT:Faridabad Complex Administration & Others DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2005 BENCH:Ruma Pal & C.K. Thakker JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of S.L.P. (c) No. 6360 of 2002) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No. 2846 OF 2005 (Arising out ...
Supreme Court Of India
Anwarul Haq vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: Arijit Pasayat, S H Kapadia
26 April, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 625-626 of 2005 PETITIONER:Anwarul Haq RESPONDENT:The State of Uttar Pradesh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2005 BENCH:ARIJIT PASAYAT & S.H. KAPADIA JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos. 4321-22 of 2004) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Leave granted.Appellant calls in question le...
Supreme Court Of India
Nagalla Mukha Lingam vs State Of A P
Judges: B P Singh, Arun Kumar
26 April, 2005·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1374 of 1999 PETITIONER:NAGALLA MUKHA LINGAM RESPONDENT:STATE OF A.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2005 BENCH:B.P.SINGH & ARUN KUMAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P.SINGH,J.We have heard counsel for the parties.The appellant herein along with 40 others was put up for trial before the A...
Supreme Court Of India
Pandit Dhana Mali vs Bhimabai (D) Th. Lrs.
Judges: R Lahoti, D Dharmadhikari, P Balasubramanyan
26 April, 2005·1. An application seeking review of the judgment passed by the High Court in second appeal has bene dismissed on the ground 'not maintainable'. The learned single Judge of the High Court has held that as against a judgment in second appeal "a remedy by way of application of review is entirely miscon...
Supreme Court Of India
Hindustan Leverltd. and Anr vs Sales Tax Officer and Ors
Judges: Ruma Pal, C K Thakker
25 April, 2005·J U D G M E N T With SLP (C ) No.10558/2004 O R D E R The subject matter of challenge in the writ petition was a circular dated November 12, 2002 by which tea and coffee have not been treated as kiryana items or as food. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, tea and coffee were entitl...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.