Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Eicher Tractors Ltd.
Judges: S Variava, H Sema
14 January, 2004·1. This appeal is against the Judgment of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal dated 22nd October, 1997.Briefly stated the facts are as follows :-The respondents manufacture diesel engines. While selling diesel engines they recover from all customers a sum of Rs. 300/- ostensibly ...
Supreme Court Of India
Synthetics And Chemicals Ltd. vs Collector Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: S Variava, H Sema
14 January, 2004·1. This Appeal is against an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, dated 9/13 February, 1998. The question for consideration is whether the intermediate product manufactured by the Appellants is excisable. It appears that on 23rd December, 1985 a Notification was issued...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of C. Ex., New Delhi vs Malwa Vanaspati And Chem. Co. Ltd.
Judges: P V Reddi, S Kapadia
14 January, 2004·1. The Issue raised in this appeal is whether the cost of metal/tin containers used in packing of manufactured goods, viz. vegetable products is includible in the assessable value of the goods. The contention of the learned senior counsel for the appellant is that the security deposit equivalent to ...
Supreme Court Of India
Gtc Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: S Variava, H Sema
13 January, 2004·1. This Appeal is against the Order dated 12th January, 1998 of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal.2. Briefly stated, the facts are as follows :Prior to 1st March, 1979, duty was levied on un-manufactured tobacco. With effect from 1st March, 1979, that duty was withdrawn. A Noti...
Supreme Court Of India
Leelawati And Anr. vs Ramesh Chand And Ors.
Judges: S V Patil, D Dharmadhikari
13 January, 2004·1. This petition has been filed for transfer of Criminal Complaint No. 517 of 2001 under Section 302, 201 and 34 IPC (titled as Smt. Leelawati v. Ramesh Chand and Ors.) for investigation from Faridabad to Delhi. On 14.8.2003, this Court directed the Superintendent of Police, Faridabad (Haryana) to c...
Supreme Court Of India
G.D. Engineering Construction vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: V Khare, S Kapadia
13 January, 2004·1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The short question that arises in this case is whether the Arbitrator was required to give reasons in the Award.3. The High Court by the impugned judgment has set aside the Award merely on the ground that the Arbitrator had not given reasons for giving his Award. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Namdang Tea Estate
Judges: B Kumar, P V Reddi
13 January, 2004·1. In this appeal, the question involved pertains to refund of the excise duty, which according to the respondent was realised at a higher rate not applicable to it. Accordingly, the respondent moved an application under Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, for refund of the excess...
Supreme Court Of India
Jamshed Hormusji Wadia vs Board Of Trustees, Port Of Mumbai & Anr
Judges: R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
13 January, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5559 of 2001 PETITIONER:Jamshed Hormusji Wadia RESPONDENT:Board of Trustees, Port of Mumbai & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/01/2004 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & BRIJESH KUMAR .JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT With C.A. No.5562/2001, C.A. No.5561/2001, C.A. No.5‘‘563-5564/2001, C.A. No.5565-5566/2001, C...
Supreme Court Of India
Ahmedabad Pvt. Primary Teachers' ... vs Administrative Officer And Ors
Judges: Shivaraj V Patil, D M Dharmadhikari
13 January, 2004·JUDGMENT 2004(1) SCR 47 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DHARMADHIKARI. J. This appeal has been preferred by Ahmedabad Private Primary Teacher's Association. The Association complains that in the petition filed by an individual teacher [respondent no. 2 herein] employed in a school run by ...
Supreme Court Of India
Divisional Forest Officer, ... vs Collector Of C. Ex. And Cus.
Judges: S Variava, H Sema
13 January, 2004·1. This appeal is against an order dated 5th December, 1997 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal. The question raised is whether the Appellants are liable to pay excise duty in respect of sleepers supplied by them to the railways.2. It was submitted that the Appellants w...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.