Manik Lal Mazumdar & Ors vs Gouranga Chandra Dey & Ors
Judges: Shivaraj V Patil
26 February, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7253 of 2002 PETITIONER:Manik Lal Mazumdar & Ors.RESPONDENT:Gouranga Chandra Dey & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/02/2004 BENCH:Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J.Few facts, which are considered necessary and relevant for disposal of this appeal, in sho...
Supreme Court Of India
Sajan Abraham vs State Of Kerala
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
26 February, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1022 of 1997 PETITIONER:Sajan Abraham RESPONDENT:State of Kerala DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/02/2004 BENCH:N. SANTOSH HEGDE & B.P. SINGH JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P. Singh, J.The appellant herein was charged of having committed the offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic...
Supreme Court Of India
Pramod Malhotra And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: S N Variava, H K Sema
26 February, 2004·JUDGMENT 2004(2) SCR 688 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.N. VARIAVA, J. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging a scheme framed by the Reserve Bank of India (for short RBI). Mr. Lalit very fairly stated at the beginning that he is not challenging the scheme and that the only praye...
Supreme Court Of India
Lella Srinivasa Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
26 February, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 946 of 1997 PETITIONER:Lella Srinivasa Rao RESPONDENT:State of Andhra Pradesh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/02/2004 BENCH:N.SANTOSH HEGDE & B.P. SINGH.JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT B.P. SINGH, J.This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High court of Judicature...
Supreme Court Of India
M A Kuttappan vs E Krishnan Nayanar And Another
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
26 February, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 450 of 1997 PETITIONER:M.A. Kuttappan RESPONDENT:E. Krishnan Nayanar and another DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/02/2004 BENCH:N. SANTOSH HEGDE & B.P. SINGH.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P. Singh, J.The appellant in this appeal by special leave is aggrieved by the order of the High Court of...
Supreme Court Of India
Bareilly Development Authority vs Vrinda Gujarati & Ors
Judges: Ar Lakshmanan, G P Mathur
26 February, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 3706 of 1998 PETITIONER:Bareilly Development Authority RESPONDENT:Vrinda Gujarati & Ors.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/02/2004 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu, Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & G.P. Mathur.JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT Dr. AR. Lakshmanan This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.5...
Supreme Court Of India
Sarija Banu (A) Janarthani @ ... vs State Through Inspector Of Police
Judges: K Balakrishnan, B Srikrishna
26 February, 2004·1. Leave granted.2. Heard both sides.3. This is an appeal directed against an order denying bail to the appellants. The appellants are accused in a criminal case registered under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) and under Section 25 of the NDPS Act. The prosecution case is that police got an information on 10.7...
Supreme Court Of India
Manik Lal Majumdar And Others vs Gauranga Chandra Dey And Others
Judges: D M Dharmadhikari
26 February, 2004·J U D G M E N T Dharmadhikari J.This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.6.2001 passed by the High Court of Gauhati. The appellant is the tenant of the leased premises in dispute. The appeal to the Appellate Authority against the order of eviction from the leased premises on the ground of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Pramod Malhotra And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: S N Variava, H K Sema
26 February, 2004·JUDGMENT 2004(2) SCR 688 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.N. VARIAVA, J. This Writ Petition has been filed challenging a scheme framed by the Reserve Bank of India (for short RBI). Mr. Lalit very fairly stated at the beginning that he is not challenging the scheme and that the only praye...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of C. Ex., Chennai vs Indian Organic Chemicals Ltd.
Judges: S Variava, H Sema
26 February, 2004·1. This Appeal is against the judgment of the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (in short "CEGAT") dated 26th September, 1996.2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows :-The Respondents manufacture Polyester Fibre. In the manufacture of Polyester Fibre, there is an intermediate pr...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.