State Through S P, New Delhi vs Ratan Lal Arora
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
26 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 532 of 2004 PETITIONER:State through S.P., New Delhi RESPONDENT:Ratan Lal Arora DATE OF JUDGMENT: 26/04/2004 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) NO. 4693/2003) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Leave granted.By the impugned judgment a lea...
Supreme Court Of India
Arun Aggarwal vs Reetam Aggarwal
Judges: R C Lahoti, Ashok Bhan
26 April, 2004·J U D G M E N T O R D E R With Transfer Petition (Civil) Nos. 3-4 of 2004 Reetam Aggrawal Versus Arun Aggarwal This order shall dispose of Transfer Petition(Crl.) No. 311 of 2003 filed at the instance of Shri Arun Aggarwal (husband) seeking transfer of case No. 183/11 of 2002 titled Reetam Aggarwal ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramji Purshottam ( D ) By Lrs & Ors vs Laxmanbhai D, Kurlawala ( D ) By Lrs & Anr
Judges: R C Lahoti, Ashok Bhan
23 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5658-5659 of 1998 PETITIONER:Ramji Purshottam (D) by Lrs. & Ors.RESPONDENT:Laxmanbhai D, Kurlawala (D) by Lrs. & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/04/2004 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & ASHOK BHAN.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T R.C. Lahoti, J.The suit premises are part of the property known as Eaglew...
Supreme Court Of India
New Moga Transport ... vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. ...
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
23 April, 2004·J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 11455/2003) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Leave granted.In this appeal, the only question that is raised is whether the High Court's conclusion that the Civil Court at Barnala had jurisdiction to try the suit filed by respondent No.1-United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (he...
Supreme Court Of India
New Moga Transport Company,Through Its Proprietor Krishanlal Jhanwar vs United India Insurance Co Ltd And Ors
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
23 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2645 of 2004 PETITIONER:New Moga Transport Company,Through its Proprietor Krishanlal Jhanwar RESPONDENT:United India Insurance Co. Ltd. And Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/04/2004 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 11455/2003)...
Supreme Court Of India
Parvinder Singh vs Renu Gautam & Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti Brijesh Kumar, Arun Kumar
22 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1680-1681 of 1999 PETITIONER:Parvinder Singh RESPONDENT:Renu Gautam & Ors.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/04/2004 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI, BRIJESH KUMAR & ARUN KUMAR.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T R.C. Lahoti, J.The suit premises consist of a shop bearing No.96/1, Lower Bazar, Shimla, governed by t...
Supreme Court Of India
Gurudeo Prasad Gupta vs State Of Bihar
Judges: B Agarwal, A Lakshmanan
22 April, 2004·1. Heard the parties.2. The sole appellant was convicted by the trial court under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three months which is the minimum sentence prescribed there...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of H.P. And Ors vs Raj Kumar Brijender Singh And Ors
Judges: Brijesh Kumar, Arun Kumar
22 April, 2004·JUDGMENT 2004 Supp(1) SCR 618 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The dispute in this appeal relates relates to declaration of surplus area under the provisions of the Himachal Paradesh Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). On coming into force of the...
Supreme Court Of India
S. Jeevanantham vs State Through Inspector Of ...
Judges: K G Balakrishnan, B N Srikrishna
21 April, 2004·JUDGMENT 2004 Supp(1) SCR 607 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The appellants in these two appeals were tried by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Madurai. Both of them were found guilty of offences under section 8(C) read with section 20(b)(2) of the NDPS Act. PW-7 the Sub-Inspector, Thi...
Supreme Court Of India
The New Friends Co-Operative ... vs Rajesh Chawla And Ors
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
21 April, 2004·J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.The appellant-society calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by Division Bench of the Delhi High Court whereby it was held that respondents 1 to 3 were not defaulters and, therefore, demands raised against them for the period prior to 4th August, 1984 w...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.