Sahdeo & Ors vs State Of U P
Judges: K G Balakrishnan, B N Srikrishna
30 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 11-13 of 2004 PETITIONER:Sahdeo & Ors.RESPONDENT:State of U.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/04/2004 BENCH:K.G. Balakrishnan & B.N.Srikrishna.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2004 Satyendra .. Appellant Vs.State of U.P. .. Respondent K.G. BALAK...
Supreme Court Of India
Anil Sharma & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
30 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 622-624 of 2003 PETITIONER:Anil Sharma & Ors.RESPONDENT:State of Jharkhand DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/04/2004 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T With Crl.A. No. 798 of 2003 ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Six persons faced trial for alleged commission of offences puni...
Supreme Court Of India
Yeshwant Sakhalkar And Anr. vs Hirabat Kamat Mhamai And Anr.
Judges: S Sinha, S Kapadia
30 April, 2004·1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 27th March, 2003 passed by the High Court of Bombay at Goa in Writ Petition Nos. 326-327 of 2002 whereby the order passed by the Additional District Judge, Panaji in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 61 of 1998 allowing an ap...
Supreme Court Of India
Sahdeo And Ors. vs State Of U.P. [Alongwith Criminal ...
Judges: K Balakrishnan, B Srikrishna
30 April, 2004·JUDGMENT K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. Eleven accused were tried by the court of sessions, Muzaffarnagar, for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 395, 397, 452 and 302 read with Section 149 IPC. There were also charges against some of the accused under Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act. After the tr...
Supreme Court Of India
Captain Sube Singh & Ors vs Lt Governor Of Delhi & Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti B N Srikrishna, G P Mathur
30 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1725 of 2001 PETITIONER:Captain Sube Singh & Ors.RESPONDENT:Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 30/04/2004 BENCH:R. C. Lahoti, B. N. Srikrishna & G. P. Mathur JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T SRIKRISHNA, J.This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of th...
Supreme Court Of India
Tekaba Ao And Anr vs Sakumeren Ao And Anr
Judges: Shivaraj V Patil, D M Dharmadhikari
29 April, 2004·JUDGMENT 2004 Supp(1) SCR 897 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DHARMADHIKARI, J. This appeal arises from a dispute between two clans of two villages in the HilI District of Mokokchung in North-Eastem State of Nagaland. The dispute between the two clans of the two villages is concerning the...
Supreme Court Of India
Chanda And Ors vs State Of U P & Anr
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
29 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 241 of 1998 PETITIONER:Chanda and Ors.RESPONDENT:State of U.P. & Anr.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/2004 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT,J Conviction of the accused-appellant was altered by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of West Bengal vs Sadan K Bormal & Anr
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
29 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 877 of 1998 PETITIONER:State of West Bengal RESPONDENT:Sadan K. Bormal & Anr.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/2004 BENCH:N. SANTOSH HEGDE & B.P. SINGH JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T B.P. SINGH, J.The State of West Bengal has preferred this appeal by Special Leave impugning the judgment and o...
Supreme Court Of India
Raj Kumar Jain & Anr vs Kundan Jain & Anr
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
29 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 554 of 2004 PETITIONER:Raj Kumar Jain & Anr.RESPONDENT:Kundan Jain & Anr.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/2004 BENCH:N Santosh Hegde & B P Singh.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 5035/2003) SANTOSH HEGDE, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties. Leave granted.This...
Supreme Court Of India
Daulat Trimbak Shewale & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
29 April, 2004·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 663 of 1998 PETITIONER:Daulat Trimbak Shewale & Ors.RESPONDENT:State of Maharashtra DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/04/2004 BENCH:N.Santosh Hegde & B.P.Singh.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T SANTOSH HEGDE,J.The appellants herein were tried for offences punishable under Sections 302, 325 and 324 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.