Dev Singh vs Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Ltd & Anr
Judges: N Santosh Hegdeb P Singh
02 September, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6918 of 2003 PETITIONER:Dev Singh RESPONDENT:Vs.Punjab Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/09/2003 BENCH:N.Santosh Hegde)B.P.Singh JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Arising out of S.L.P.©No.8462 of 2002) SANTOSH HEGDE,J.Leave granted.Heard learned counsel...
Supreme Court Of India
Kailash Kumar Sanwatia vs The State Of Bihar And Anr
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
02 September, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 904 of 1996 PETITIONER:Kailash Kumar Sanwatia RESPONDENT:Vs.The State of Bihar and Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/09/2003 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.The appeal is at the instance of the informant who set law in motion against r...
Supreme Court Of India
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Ajit Kumar And Ors
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
02 September, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6915-6916 of 2003 PETITIONER:National Insurance Co.Ltd.RESPONDENT:Vs.Ajit Kumar and Ors.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/09/2003 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 18242-18243/2002) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J Leave granted.The only question...
Supreme Court Of India
Vajrapu Sambayya Naidu & Ors vs State Of A P & Ors
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
02 September, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 603 of 2002 PETITIONER:Vajrapu Sambayya Naidu & Ors.RESPONDENT:Vs.State of A. P. & Ors.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/09/2003 BENCH:N. Santosh Hegde & B. P. Singh.JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT B.P. SINGH, J.In this appeal by special leave, the appellants have impugned the judgment and order of the ...
Supreme Court Of India
M A Murthy vs State Of Karnataka And Ors
Judges:
02 September, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6913-6914 of 2003 PETITIONER:M.A. Murthy RESPONDENT:Vs.State of Karnataka and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/09/2003 BENCH:JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 8113-8114/2002) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J Leave granted.Both these appeals have common factual matrix, and legal ...
Supreme Court Of India
Dena Snuff (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, ...
Judges: R Pal, A Bhan
02 September, 2003·1. The appellant classified its product under sub-heading 2404.60 of the Central Excise Act and paid duty on that basis till 27-7-90 when, according to the appellant, the Inspector Central Excise verbally declined to clear the appellant's product unless the duty at a higher rate under tariff heading...
Supreme Court Of India
Sukhdev Singh vs Delhi State ( Govt Of Nct Of Delhi )
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat
01 September, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 54 of 2003 PETITIONER:Sukhdev Singh RESPONDENT:Vs.Delhi State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/09/2003 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Appellant faced trial for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs Prince Gutka Ltd.
Judges: N S Hegde, B Singh
01 September, 2003·1. Heard learned Counsel for both the parties.2. It is observed by the Tribunal in the impugned order that the Revenue has not challenged the duty demand which was dropped by the Commissioner. The learned Attorney General appearing for the Union has pointed out that in fact the Revenue has filed an ...
Supreme Court Of India
Justice P.Venugopal vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: V N Khare Cj, Ashok Bhan, S B Sinha
01 September, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003 Supp(3) SCR 286 The Order of the Court is as follows1. The petitioner is a former judge of the Madras High Court. He was appointed on 25.01.1979 and superannuated on 07.12.1981. In the meanwhile, by a notification dated 29.07.1981, he was appointed as Commission of Inquiry to inquire i...
Supreme Court Of India
Regional Officer C B S E vs Ku Sheena Peethambaran And Ors
Judges: Brijesh Kumar, Arun Kumar
01 September, 2003·(1) Notice of admission was given to the respondents.(2) There is a report that respondents have refused the notice.(3) Let a fresh notice be sent by way of registered post also and service be effected by affixation. The Notices be issued for 18th April, 1995.(4) In para 11 of the Petition, it has b...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.