Commnr. Of Central Excise vs M/S. G. Dayaram and Co
Judges: H L Dattu, R K Agrawal, Arun Mishra
31 March, 2003·1. The issue that arises for our consideration and decision is, whether a 'race-club' would fall under the scope of the definition of the word 'shop', for the purposes of notification issued under sub-section (5) of section 1 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short, “the ESI Act”).2. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mehsana Dist. Co-Op. Milk P.U. ... vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: R Pal, B Srikrishna
31 March, 2003·1. Leave granted.2. The issue here relates to the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise and Customs, under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. By the impugned order, the appellants have been directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 30 lakhs by way of pre-deposit. The reason...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S. Polyglass Acrylic ... vs Commissioner Of Customs, ...
Judges: M B Shah, Arun Kumar
31 March, 2003·J U D G M E N T R.C. Lahoti, J.A number of workers were engaged as casual labourers for the purpose of expansion of telecom facilities in the district of Belgaum, Karnataka, during the years 1985-86 and 1986-87. The services of these workers were utilized for digging, laying cables, erecting poles, ...
Supreme Court Of India
Savithri Yeshwantrao Chagule And ... vs Chamu Junnappa Sheri And Ors.
Judges: R Pal, B Srikrishna
31 March, 2003·1. Leave granted.2. The appellants filed a suit claiming their mother's interest in the suit property. The trial Court decreed the suit in favour of the appellants. The first appeal filed by the respondents herein was also dismissed. In second appeal, the High Court, without framing a question of la...
Supreme Court Of India
Cehat And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: M Shah, A Kumar
31 March, 2003·ORDER WP (C) No. 344 of 20021. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Permission granted. The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.WP (C) No. 301 of 20002. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioners points out t...
Supreme Court Of India
Manohar Lal @ Manohar Singh vs Maya
Judges: R Lahoti, A Kumar
31 March, 2003·JUDGMENT R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted.2. A suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell an immoveable property, which is an agricultural land, was directed to be decreed by the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court. In Second Appeal preferred by the defendant the High Court has uphel...
Supreme Court Of India
The Bangalore Turf Club Ltd vs Regional Director, Employees State Insurance CorportionThe Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd vs Employees State Insurance Corportion & OrsThe Employees State Insurance Corportion & Ors vs Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd & Anr PageRoyal Western India Turf Club Ltd vs The Employees State Insurance Corportion & OrsRoyal Western India Turf Club Ltd vs The Employees State Insurance Corportion & Anr AndSri Visalam Chit Funds Limited vs Deputy Director, Sub Regional Office, Madurai Page
Judges: H L Dattu, R K Agrawal, Arun Mishra
31 March, 2003·CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2416 OF 2003, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 49 OF 2006, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1575 OF 2006, CIVIL APPEAL NO.3421 OF 2012 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3422 OF 2012H.L. DATTU, J.1. The issue that arises for our consideration and decision is, whether a 'race-club' would fall under the scope of the definition of...
Supreme Court Of India
S M Nilajkar & Ors vs Telecom District Manager, Karnataka
Judges: R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
31 March, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1239-1244 of 2001 Appeal (civil) 1245-1248 of 2001 PETITIONER:S.M. Nilajkar & Ors.RESPONDENT:Telecom. District Manager, Karnataka DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/03/2003 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & BRIJESH KUMAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T R.C. Lahoti, J.A number of workers were engaged as casual ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohd Aslam @ Bhure vs Union Of India ( Uoi ) And Ors
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, M B Shah, N Santosh Hegde
31 March, 2003·CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 160 of 2002 PETITIONER:Mohd. Aslam @ Bhure RESPONDENT:Union of India (UOI) and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/03/2003 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu & Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri & M.B. Shah & N.Santosh Hegde JUDGMENT:& JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY RAJENDRA BABU, J.Rajendra Babu, J.1. In th...
Supreme Court Of India
D S Parvathamma vs A Srinivasan
Judges: R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
31 March, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1527 of 2000 PETITIONER:D.S. Parvathamma RESPONDENT:A. Srinivasan DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31/03/2003 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & BRIJESH KUMAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T R.C. Lahoti, J.The suit premises forming part of the building No.25, 5th Cross, Annamma Temple Extension, Ramakrishnapuram...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.