Achaldas Durgaji Oswal (Dead) ... vs Ramvilas Gangabisan Heda (Dead) ...
Judges: V N Khare Cj, S B Sinha, Dr Ar Lakshmanan
15 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 340 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.B. SINHA, J. Leave granted.This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 9th November. 2001 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Civil Revision Application No. 310 of 1998 whereby and whereund...
Supreme Court Of India
Densons Pultretaknik vs Commissioner Of Central Excise
Judges: M Shah, A Kumar
15 January, 2003·ORDER C.A. Nos. 7635 and 9516 of 1995 :1. The appellants who are manufacturing Epoxy Cast Components i.e. crotch belly, bushing etc. submitted classification list in the year 1987 for the said articles contending that it was classifiable under sub-heading 3926.90. For other articles, namely insulati...
Supreme Court Of India
G.S. Auto International Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise ...
Judges: Syed Shah Quadri, Ashok Bhan
15 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 372 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J. This bunch of appeals raises a common question of classifications of certain goods (thirty two items), which will be referred to presently, manufactured by the assessee-appellant in Civil Appeal Nos. 4...
Supreme Court Of India
Charanjit Singh vs R.C. Jain And Anr.
Judges: S R Babu, P V Reddi
15 January, 2003·1. This is a peculiar and extraordinary petition filed purportedly under Article 136 of the Constitution by a person who is bent upon denigrating the Judges of the Civil Court, the District Court and the High Court either for passing orders not to his liking in a civil suit and the writ petition pre...
Supreme Court Of India
A.P.S.R.T.C. And Anr vs S. Narsagoud
Judges: R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
15 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 386 The following Order of the Court was delivered The respondent was a Conductor, and hence a workman, in the employment of the appellant Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation. He remained absent from duty between 5.6.1982 and 8.8.1982 on the first occasion and again...
Supreme Court Of India
Geeta Devi And Anr. vs Daulati Devi And Ors.
Judges: V Kharea, S Sinha, A Lakshmanan
15 January, 2003·JUDGMENT Lakshmanan, J.1. The short question that arises for consideration in these appeals is : Whether a party to the compromise decree can file a petition under Section 4 of the Partition Act, 1893 where parties to a partition suit entered into a compromise and a decree was passed in terms thereo...
Supreme Court Of India
Alpine Industries vs Collector Of Central Excise, New ...
Judges: M B Shah, D M Dharmadhikari
14 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 313 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DHARMADHIKARI, J. The present two appeals have been preferred under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 against the three-member Judgement [reported in 1997 (92) E.L.T.53 (Tribunal) of the Customs, Excise & Gold ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Sant Ram Mangat Ram Jewellers And ...
Judges: M Shah, D Dharmadhikari
14 January, 2003·1. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. The appellant shall pay Rs. 10,000 as costs because of the delay of 247 days in filing these special leave petitions.3. Delay condoned.4. Leave granted.5. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated September 20, 1999, passed by the In...
Supreme Court Of India
Kedia Agglomerated Marbles Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: M B Shah, D M Dharmadhikari
14 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 320 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DHARMADHIKARI J. The appellant M/s Kedia Agglomerated Marbles Limited is engaged in manufacture of floor tells which are marketed by them in the trade name "Marbella Agglomerated Marbles" and "Marbellam Tiles." The product of the a...
Supreme Court Of India
Ram Narain Popli vs Central Bureau Of Investigation
Judges: M B Shah, B N Agrawal, Arijit Pasayat
14 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003(1) SCR 119 The Judgments/Order of the Court were delivered SHAH, J. The entire prosecution version is around the following five transactions entered into by Maruti Udyog Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'MUL'), through United Commercial Bank (hereinafter referred to as "UCO Bank') w...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.