Shambhu Investment P. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: R Pal, B Srikrishna
21 January, 2003·1. We have learned counsel for the parties.2. We see no reason to interfere with the conclusion arrived at by the High Court on the question as framed under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs....
Supreme Court Of India
Shambhu Investment (P) Ltd. vs Cit
Judges:
21 January, 2003·ORDER We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. We see no reason to interfere with the conclusion arrived at by the High Court on the question as framed under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.2. We...
Supreme Court Of India
U O I vs A P Bajpai And Ors
Judges: Shivaraj V Paul, H K Sema
20 January, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 16838 of 1996 PETITIONER:U.O.I.RESPONDENT:A.P. BAJPAI AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/01/2003 BENCH:SHIVARAJ V. PAUL & H.K. SEMA JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2003(1) SCR 429 The following Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J. This appeal is directed against the order ...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri Justice S K Ray vs State Of Orissa And Ors
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, P Venkatarama Reddi
20 January, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2421 of 2001 PETITIONER:SHRI JUSTICE S.K. RAY RESPONDENT:STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/01/2003 BENCH:S. RAJENDRA BABU & P. VENKATARAMA REDDI JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 434 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. The appellant was Chief...
Supreme Court Of India
U Dhar & Anr vs The State Of Jharkhand & Anr
Judges: M B Shah, Arun Kumar
20 January, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 70 of 2003 PETITIONER:U. Dhar & Anr.RESPONDENT:The State of Jharkhand & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/01/2003 BENCH:M.B. Shah & ARUN KUMAR JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARUN KUMAR, J.WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 71 OF 2003 (Arising out of SLP(CRL) No. 2698 of 2002 (Arising out of SLP (CRL....
Supreme Court Of India
Darpan Kumar Sharma @ Dharban ... vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, P Venkatarama Reddi
20 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003(1) SCR 442 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. In this petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India the petitioner is seeking for quashing of an order made under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug...
Supreme Court Of India
Nishikant Sukerkar vs Government Of India And Ors.
Judges: K Balakrishnan, A Kumar
20 January, 2003·JUDGMENT K.G. Balakrishnan, J.1. The first petitioner in Civil Writ Petition No. 5648 of 1998 on the file of the High Court of Delhi is the petitioner before us and prays for transfer of the said Writ Petition to the Bombay High Court, Panaji Bench, Goa, to be heard along with Civil Writ Petition No...
Supreme Court Of India
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. ... vs N. Rangaswamy
Judges: R Pal, B Srikrishna
17 January, 2003·1. Leave granted.2. By consent of the parties the orders of the Division Bench and the Trial Court are set aside and the application for interim relief filed by the plaintiff-respondent is disposed of by directing the appellant to maintain separate accounts in respect of the sales of the particular ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka vs Vishwabharathi House Building ...
Judges: V N Khare Cj, K G Balakrishnan, S B Sinha
17 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003(1) SCR 397 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.B. SINHA, J. The primal question involved in this batch of appeals and the Writ Petitions is the constitutionality of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter called "the Act").Civil Appeals No. 4613 and 4614 of 1999 filed b...
Supreme Court Of India
Narcotics Control Bureau vs Ghashiram Kanhyalal Solanki And ...
Judges: B Kumar, H Sema
17 January, 2003·1. Leave granted.2. This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment and order passed by the Bombay High Court granting bail to the accused-respondent for offences punishable under Sections 8(c)/21/25/27/27-A and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. According to the pros...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.