Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs Kartik Steels Limited
Judges: M Shah, D Dharmadhikari, A Kumar
24 January, 2003·1. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 11th September 2001 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT for short), South Zonal Bench at Chennai in Appeal No. E/R-331 of 1997. That appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order passed by the Com...
Supreme Court Of India
K.C.G. Verghese vs K.T. Rajendran And Anr
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, D M Dharmadhikari, G P Mathur
24 January, 2003·JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 552 The Order of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. On an order of eviction passed against him in RCOP NO. 3598/86 by the Rent Controller the contemnor No.l -KT. Rajendran-filed C.R.P. Nos 1001-1002 of 1995 on the file the High Court of Madras and on dismissal thereof...
Supreme Court Of India
Ghaziabad Development Authroity vs Anoop Singh And Another
Judges: K G Balakrishnan, P Venkatarama Reddi
23 January, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5101 of 1996 PETITIONER:Ghaziabad Development Authroity RESPONDENT:Anoop Singh and Another DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2003 BENCH:K.G. Balakrishnan & P. Venkatarama Reddi JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T WITH Civil Appeal NO. 5102 OF 1996 P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.In these appeals by Speci...
Supreme Court Of India
High Court Of Judicature At Bombay Through Registrar And Anr vs Brij Mohan Gupta ( Dead ) Through Lrs And Anr
Judges: V N Khare Cji, S B Sinha, Ar Lakshmanan
23 January, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 137 of 1999 PETITIONER:HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THROUGH REGISTRAR AND ANR.RESPONDENT:BRIJ. MOHAN GUPTA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2003 BENCH:V.N. KHARE CJI. & S.B. SINHA & DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2003 (1) SCR 532 The Judgment o...
Supreme Court Of India
S M S Sandhu vs Chandigarh Administration & Ors
Judges: Brijesh Kumar, H K Sema
23 January, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 498 of 2003 PETITIONER:S.M.S.Sandhu RESPONDENT:Chandigarh Administration & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2003 BENCH:Brijesh Kumar & H.K.Sema. JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT (arising out of S.L.P. No.15555 of 2002) Brijesh Kumar, J.Leave granted.The appellant is aggrieved by the order passe...
Supreme Court Of India
Bhagwan Singh & Ors vs State Of M P
Judges: S Rajendra Babu D M Dharmadhikari, G P Mathur
23 January, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 789 of 2002 PETITIONER:Bhagwan Singh & Ors RESPONDENT:State of M.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/01/2003 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu , D. M. Dharmadhikari & G.P. Mathur.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T DHARMADHIKARI, J The High Court of Madhya Pradesh Bench at Gwalior by impugned Judgment 11.3.2002...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Vipan Kumar Jain And Ors.
Judges: R Pal, B Srikrishna
23 January, 2003·1. Between September 30, 1998, and October 15, 1998, the premises of the respondents was searched under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). The search party was headed by one Harinder Kumar who had been appointed as the authorised officer for the purposes ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Indo Nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd.
Judges: R Pal, B Srikrishna
23 January, 2003·1. In all these appeals, the pivotal issue involved is : Is it permissible for the Assessing Officer under the Income-tax Act to adopt different methods of valuation of excise duty paid raw material when purchased and the unconsumed raw material on hand at the end of the year ?2. The assessees are m...
Supreme Court Of India
Yusuf @ Babu Khan vs State Of Rajasthan
Judges: N S Hegde, B Singh
23 January, 2003·1. The appellants in the above appeals have been found guilty of offences punishable under Section 5 and 6 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) and were sentenced to 5 years' Rl with fine of Rs. 500/- each; in default a simple imprisonment for 3 months was awarded...
Supreme Court Of India
N.C. John and Sons Ltd. vs Cit
Judges:
22 January, 2003·ORDER We have (sic) learned counsel for the parties.2. We see no reason to interfere with the judgment under appeal. The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs.2. We see no reason to interfere with the judgment under appeal. The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.