State Of U P vs Man Singh & Ors
Judges: Shivraj V Patil, Arun Kumar
24 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 65-66 of 1995 PETITIONER:State of U.P.RESPONDENT:Man Singh & Ors.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/10/2002 BENCH:SHIVRAJ V. PATIL & ARUN KUMAR..JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARUN KUMAR, J.These appeals are directed against a Division Bench judgment dated 9.1.1992 of the Allahabad High Court all...
Supreme Court Of India
P Tulsi Das And Ors vs Government Of A P And Ors
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, H K Sema
24 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2652-2654 of 1995 PETITIONER:P. TULSI DAS AND ORS.RESPONDENT:GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/10/2002 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & H.K. SEMA JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 Supp(3) SCR 306 The Judgment of the Court was delivered Leave granted in special leave petition (C) N...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Escorts Jcb Limited, Commissioner Of Central Excise, Delhi vs Commissioner Of Central Excise Delhi-Ii, M/S Escorts Jcb Limited
Judges: S N Variava, Brijesh Kumar
24 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7230 of 1999 Appeal (civil) 1163 of 2000 PETITIONER:M/s. Escorts JCB Limited, Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi RESPONDENT:Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi-II, M/s. Escorts JCB Limited DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/10/2002 BENCH:S.N. Variava & Brijesh Kumar.JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT B...
Supreme Court Of India
Mahant Chand Nath Yogi & Anr vs State Of Haryana
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Shivaraj V Patil
24 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1087-1088 of 2002 PETITIONER:Mahant Chand Nath yogi & Anr.RESPONDENT:State of Haryana DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/10/2002 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & SHIVARAJ V. PATIL.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Shivaraj V. Patil J.Leave granted.Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.We feel it ne...
Supreme Court Of India
The Tata Iron & Steel Co Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise, Jamshedpur
Judges: S N Variava, Brijesh Kumar
24 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 508 of 1998 PETITIONER:The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.RESPONDENT:Collector of Central Excise, Jamshedpur DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/10/2002 BENCH:S. N. VARIAVA & BRIJESH KUMAR. JUDGMENT:(WITH C.A. No. 3530/1997, C. A. Nos. 987- 996/1998, C. A. Nos. 2785-2790/2001, C. A. Nos. 3002-30...
Supreme Court Of India
Commodore B.Y. Wad vs Rallis India Ltd. And Anr.
Judges: S Variava, A Kumar
24 October, 2002·1. These two appeals are being disposed of by this common order. Both the appeals are against the judgment dated 10-3-1999. In this judgment parties will be referred to in their capacity in civil appeal 594/2000. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:-The appellant is the landlord of a flat in "Oy...
Supreme Court Of India
Trackparts Of India Ltd. vs Collector Of Customs
Judges: M Shah, P V Reddi, D Dharmadhikari
24 October, 2002·1. These appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 24-11-1993 passed in A. Nos. C/1997-1999/86, C/239-243/88-B2, C/2699-2700/88-B2, C/2003/89-B2, C/1462/90-B2 and C/486-500/93-B2 passed by the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short 'the Tribunal...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ... vs Morgenstern Werner
Judges: M Shah, P V Reddi, D Dharmadhikari
24 October, 2002·1. The High Court has given a specific finding that the respondent-assessee had not stayed in India during the preceding nine years and he was not ordinarily resident in India, and, therefore, he would be governed by the proviso to Section 5(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Admittedly, the asses...
Supreme Court Of India
Vivek Re-Rolling Mills vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: S Quadri, S Sinha
24 October, 2002·1. Four of the appellants before the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT) challenged the common Final Order Nos. E/347 to 350/94 of the CEGAT, dated July 21, 1994, in these appeals.2. The appellants claimed benefit of exemption under Notification No. 202/88-CE., dated May 20, ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan vs Ashraf And Ors.
Judges: U Banerjee, S V Patil
24 October, 2002·1. The State of Rajasthan is in appeal against the order of acquittal of the charge of Section 302/34 I.P.C. by the High Court. Learned counsel appearing in support of the appeal has been rather emphatic in his submissions that there is no proper application of mind in the matter of dealing with the...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.