Under Article 143(1 ) Of The Constitution Of India vs --------
Judges: B N Kirpal Cji, V N Khare, K G Balakrishnan, Ashok Bhan, Arijit Pasayat
28 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Special Reference Case 1 of 2002 PETITIONER:Under Article 143(1) of the Constitution of India RESPONDENT:DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/10/2002 BENCH:B.N.KIRPAL CJI & V.N.KHARE & K.G.BALAKRISHNAN & ASHOK BHAN & ARIJIT PASAYAT JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: V.N.KHARE, (J) K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, (J) ARIJIT...
Supreme Court Of India
Under Article 143(1) Of The ... vs --------
Judges: B N Kirpal Cji, V N Khare, K G Balakrishnan, Ashok Bhan, Arijit Pasayat
28 October, 2002·JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY:V.N.KHARE, (J) K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, (J) ARIJIT PASAYAT, (J) V.N. Khare, J.The dissolved Legislative Assembly of the State of Gujarat was constituted in March 1998 and its five-year term was to expire on 18.3.2003. On 19.7.2002 on the advice of the Chief Minister, the Governor of G...
Supreme Court Of India
Central Coalfields Ltd. vs Rukmini Devi And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, S V Patil, S Sinha
28 October, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. In a land acquisition proceeding against the order of the reference court the appeal was filed by the state under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act. That appeal stood dismissed by the learned single judge for nonpayment of the requisite court fee. An application for restorat...
Supreme Court Of India
Not Available vs Not Available
Judges: C J I, V N Khare, Ashok Bhan
28 October, 2002·O P I N I O N V.N. KHARE, J The dissolved Legislative Assembly of the State of Gujarat was constituted in March 1998 and its five-year term was to expire on 18.3.2003. On 19.7.2002 on the advice of the Chief Minister, the Governor of Gujarat dissolved the Legislative Assembly. The last sitting of th...
Supreme Court Of India
Not Available vs Not Available
Judges: K G Balakrishnan
28 October, 2002·O P I N I O N BALAKRISHNAN, J.I had the advantage of reading the Opinion in draft of my learned brothers V.N. Khare and Arijit Pasayat, JJ. and I fully concur with the opinion expressed by them regarding interpretation of Article 174 and the consequential answers to the reference made by the Preside...
Supreme Court Of India
Sri Suresh Yallappa Patil vs The General Manager, K.S.R.T.C. ...
Judges: V Khare, A Bhan
28 October, 2002·JUDGMENT Bhan, J.1. Leave granted.2. In spite of service there is no appearance on behalf of the respondents. Proceeded ex parte.3. This appeals is directed against the order of the High Court of Karnataka wherein the High Court has reduced the compensation awarded to the claimant/appellant from Rs....
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Rayalseema Paper Mills Ltd & Another vs Government Of A P & Others
Judges: V N Khare Ashok Bhan, S B Sinha
25 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7519-7520 of 1995 PETITIONER:M/s. Rayalseema Paper Mills Ltd. & Another RESPONDENT:Government of A.P. & Others DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/10/2002 BENCH:V.N. Khare, Ashok Bhan & S.B. Sinha JUDGMENT:WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7521-22 OF 1995, CIVIL APPEAL NOS.7523-24 OF 1995 AND CIVIL APP...
Supreme Court Of India
K Prema S Rao And Anr vs Yadla Srinivasa Rao And Ors
Judges: M B Shah, K G Balakrishnan, D M Dharmadhikari
25 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1457 of 1995 PETITIONER:K. PREMA S. RAO AND ANR.RESPONDENT:YADLA SRINIVASA RAO AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 25/10/2002 BENCH:M.B. SHAH & K.G. BALAKRISHNAN & D.M. DHARMADHIKARI JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 Supp(3) SCR 339 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DHARMADHIKARI, J. "Fr...
Supreme Court Of India
Salem Advocate Bar Association, ... vs Union Of India
Judges: B N Kirpal Cj, Y K Sabharwal, Arijit Passayat
25 October, 2002·JUDGMENT 2002 Supp(3) SCR 353 (With W.P. (C) No. 570 of 2002) The Judgment was delivered by KIRPAL, CJI.Rule.2. These writ petitions have been filed seeking to challenge amendments made to the Code of Civil Procedure by the Amendment Act 46 of 1999 and Amendment Act 22 of 2002.3. Writ Petition @ No....
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Satnam Overseas ( Export ) Through Its Partner Etc Etc vs State Of Haryana & Anr Etc Etc
Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, Ruma Pal
24 October, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 11174 of 1995 PETITIONER:M/s. Satnam Overseas (Export) Through its Partner Etc.Etc.RESPONDENT:State of Haryana & Anr.Etc.Etc. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/10/2002 BENCH:Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri & Ruma Pal.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T W I T H (C.A.Nos.11175-78/95, 11183-84/95, 11179/95, ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.