Shakeelulr Rahman vs Syed Mehdi Ispahani
Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, Arijit Pasayat
29 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7656 of 2002 PETITIONER:Shakeelulr Rahman RESPONDENT:Syed Mehdi Ispahani DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2002 BENCH:SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.Leave granted.A suit for eviction by the appellant-tenant filed by the respondent- landlo...
Supreme Court Of India
Babu Ram And Others vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: S N Variava, Arun Kumar
29 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 572 of 1994 PETITIONER:Babu Ram and others RESPONDENT:State of Madhya Pradesh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2002 BENCH:S.N. Variava & Arun Kumar JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Variava, J.This Appeal is against a judgment dated 20th August, 1992 by which the conviction of the Appellants by...
Supreme Court Of India
Kanaksingh Raisingh Rav vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
29 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 521 of 2002 PETITIONER:Kanaksingh Raisingh Rav RESPONDENT:State of Gujarat DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2002 BENCH:N.Santosh Hegde & B.P.Singh. JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T SANTOSH HEGDE,J.The appellant in this appeal was found guilty of an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC by t...
Supreme Court Of India
Arvind Prakash vs State Of U P
Judges: S Rajendra Babu P Venkatarama Reddi, Arun Kumar
29 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 510 of 1995 PETITIONER:Arvind Prakash RESPONDENT:State of U.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2002 BENCH:S. RAJENDRA BABU, P. VENKATARAMA REDDI & ARUN KUMAR.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. :On the allegation that Satya Prakash, elder brother of the appellant, was murdered b...
Supreme Court Of India
Pratibha Singh And Anr vs Shanti Devi Prasad And Anr
Judges: R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
29 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7891-7892 of 2002 PETITIONER:PRATIBHA SINGH AND ANR.RESPONDENT:SHANTI DEVI PRASAD AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2002 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & BRIJESH KUMAR JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 Supp(4) SCR 406 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Leave granted.Failure on the part o...
Supreme Court Of India
Vikas Deshpande vs Bar Council Of India & Ors
Judges: V N Khare, Ashok Bhan
29 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 4003 of 2001 PETITIONER:Vikas Deshpande RESPONDENT:Bar Council of India & Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2002 BENCH:V. N. Khare & Ashok Bhan.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Bhan, J.This appeal has been filed by Vikas Deshpande, advocate, hereinafter referred to as ’the appellant’, und...
Supreme Court Of India
Ravinder Pal Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, B P Singh
29 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 437 of 2002 PETITIONER:Ravinder Pal Singh & Anr.RESPONDENT:State of Punjab DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/11/2002 BENCH:N. Santosh Hegde & B.P. Singh JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T SANTOSH HEGDE, J.Appellants along with ten other persons were charged for offences punishable under Sections 302...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise Shillong vs North-Eastern Tobacco Co Ltd
Judges: M B Shah, D M Dharmadhikari
28 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 200-201 of 2002 PETITIONER:COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE. SHILLONG RESPONDENT:NORTH-EASTERN TOBACCO CO. LTD. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2002 BENCH:M.B. SHAH & D.M. DHARMADHIKARI JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 Supp(4) SCR 373 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by: DHARMADHIKARI, J....
Supreme Court Of India
Hemalatha Gargya vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: Ruma Pal, B N Srikrishna
28 November, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6266 of 2000 PETITIONER:HEMALATHA GARGYA RESPONDENT:COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2002 BENCH:RUMA PAL & B.N. SRIKRISHNA JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 Supp(4) SCR 382 The following Order of the Court was delivered The issue involved in all these appeals is whethe...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise vs Panchmukhi Engg. Works
Judges: S V Patil, A Pasayat
28 November, 2002·1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.2. The only question that requires consideration is whether 'Dharmada' charged by the assessees should be included in the assessable value under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, or not.3. The learned Counsel for the appellant-Revenue s...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.