Apollo Tyres Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Kochi
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, D Dharmadhikari
02 May, 2002·JUDGMENT Santosh Hegde, J.1. These appeals arise out of a common judgment delivered by a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court in ITR Nos. 70/1994 and 43/1997.2. Civil Appeal No. 6100/1998 is preferred by the assessee company and Civil Appeal Nos. 2518-19-1999 are preferred by the C.I.T., Ernakula...
Supreme Court Of India
Food Inspector vs G. Satyanarayana
Judges: R Sethi, D Raju
02 May, 2002·1. The appellant, food inspector visited the shop of the respondent where he was transacting food grains business. Suspecting that the respondent was involved in the sale of adulterated food items, the appellant purchased 750 grams of red gram dal and after compliance of the statutory formalities, s...
Supreme Court Of India
Pandit Dnyanu Khot vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: M Shah, B Singh, H Sema
02 May, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. As none was appearing on behalf of the accused despite service, we have appointed Mr. D.N. Goburdhan as amicus curiae to assist us.3. By order dated 2nd May, 2001 passed in crl. miscellaneous application No. 14/ 2001, the Vth additional sessions judge, Kolhapur set aside the judg...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India vs As&Soacnioatthieorn For Democratic Reforms
Judges: M B Shah Bisheshwar Prasad Singh, H K Sema
02 May, 2002·Vs.RESPONDENT:AS&SOACNIOATTHIEORN FOR DEMOCRATIC REFORMS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/05/2002 BENCH:M.B. Shah, Bisheshwar Prasad Singh & H.K. Sema JUDGMENT:Shah, J.Short but important question involved in these matters isin a nation wedded to republican and democratic form of government, where election as...
Supreme Court Of India
Ccoomcmhiisnsioner Of Central Excise, vs M/S Tata Tea Ltd
Judges: N Santosh Hegde, Shivaraj V Patil
02 May, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1515-1517 of 1999 PETITIONER:CCOOMCMHIISNSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S. TATA TEA LTD.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/05/2002 BENCH:N. Santosh Hegde & Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT:SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, J.The short question that arises for consideration is whether ‘instant tea...
Supreme Court Of India
Nagrik Upbhokta M Manch vs U O I & Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
02 May, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 3249 of 2002 Appeal (civil) 3250 of 2002 PETITIONER:NAGRIK UPBHOKTA M. MANCH Vs. RESPONDENT:U.O.I. & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/05/2002 BENCH:R.C. Lahoti & Brijesh Kumar JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J.Challenge in the two writ petitions, to fixation of price of kerosene, a controll...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M.I.L. Industries Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
01 May, 2002·ORDER 1 .The Tribunal has held against the Revenue relying solely on the decision in the case of Lathia Industrial Supplies Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Baroda (29 E.L.T. 751). We find that there is no discussion of the process by which old and used rollers are re-rubberized and relined...
Supreme Court Of India
Sri Champa Lal vs Sri Shaik Najmuddin Alias ...
Judges: D Mohapatra, B Kumar
01 May, 2002·JUDGMENT D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. Leave granted.2. Champa Lal, the appellant herein, is the tenant in occupation of the shop which is a part of the premises bearing No.16 South Street (Dowlath Khan Garden), Yellagundapalyum, Bangalore. Respondent No.1 Shaik Najmuddin @ Gulsheer Pasha and his wife Azeezu...
Supreme Court Of India
Sri Champa Lal vs Srgiulsshhaeiekr ...
Judges: D P Mohapatra, Brijesh Kumar
01 May, 2002·D.P.MOHAPATRA,J.Leave granted.Champa Lal, the appellant herein, is the tenant in occupation of the shop which is a part of the premises bearing No.16 South Street (Dowlath Khan Garden), Yellagundapalyam, Bangalore. Respondent No.1 Shaik Najmuddin @ Gulsheer Pasha and his wife Azeezunnissa are the ow...
Supreme Court Of India
Moti Laminates (P) Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
01 May, 2002·1. The issue of classification has become final insofar as this appeal is concerned inasmuch as the judgment of the High Court was challenged by the Revenue belatedly and the special leave petition was dismissed. In an unconnected appeal to this Court, the issue that was raised was identical to the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.