Devender Pal Singh vs State National Capital Territory ...
Judges: M Shah, B Agarwal, A Pasayat
22 March, 2002·JUDGMENT Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Notwithstanding my profound respect for Brother Shah's erudition, Iam unable to agree with his conclusions. While dealing with an accusedtried under the TADA, certain special features of the said Statute need tobe focused. It is also necessary to find out the legislativ...
Supreme Court Of India
Raja Seshaiah vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: Y Sabharwal, B P Singh
21 March, 2002·1. The appellant was a tax recovery inspector in the income tax department, He was convicted for an offence under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 by the judgment of the special judge, Hyderabad and rigorous imprisonment for a period of two ye...
Supreme Court Of India
M. Supraschand And Ors. vs C. Dhandapani And Ors.
Judges: D Raju, A Bhan
21 March, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. One T. Rajamannar (hereinafter referred to as "the testator"), who was possessed of many properties, executed a Will on 21 st of January, 1967. Property Nos. 178/79 and 180 China Bazar Road, and 3, Hanuman thereat Koil Street were to be converted into a trust which was to be admi...
Supreme Court Of India
Subhash Chander And Another Etc vs State Transport Appelate Tribunal & Others Etc
Judges: M B Shah Bisheshwar Prasad Singh, D M Dharmadhikari
21 March, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2326-2328 of 2002 Appeal (civil) 2329-2330 of 2002 Appeal (civil) 2331 of 2002 PETITIONER:SUBHASH CHANDER AND ANOTHER ETC.Vs. RESPONDENT:State transport appelate tribunal & others etc. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/2002 BENCH:M.B. Shah, Bisheshwar Prasad Singh & D.M. Dharmadh...
Supreme Court Of India
All India Judges Association And Ors vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: B N Kirpal, G B Pattanaik, V N Khare
21 March, 2002·CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 1022 of 1989 PETITIONER:ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSOCIATION AND ORS.RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/2002 BENCH:B.N. KIRPAL & G.B. PATTANAIK & V.N. KHARE JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 (2) SCR 712 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KIRPAL, J. This Wri...
Supreme Court Of India
S Renuka & Ors vs State Of A P & Anr
Judges: G B Pattanaik S N Phukan, S N Variava
21 March, 2002·CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 490 of 2000 PETITIONER:S. RENUKA & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF A. P. & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/2002 BENCH:G.B. Pattanaik, S.N. Phukan & S.N. Variava JUDGMENT:S. N. VARIAVA, J.1. The facts relevant for the purposes of this Writ Petition are as follows:The State of...
Supreme Court Of India
Raja Muthukone ( D ) By Lrs vs T Gopalasami And Anr
Judges: R C Lahoti, Ruma Pal
21 March, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6929 of 2000 PETITIONER:RAJA MUTHUKONE (D) BY LRS.RESPONDENT:T. GOPALASAMI AND ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/2002 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & RUMA PAL JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 (2) SCR 708 The following Order of the Court was delivered:A Suit for eviction of the tenant on the ground avail...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Karnataka vs Sharanappa Basanagouda Aregoudar
Judges: R P Sethi, K G Balakrishnan
21 March, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 407 of 2002 PETITIONER:STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs. RESPONDENT:SHARANAPPA BASANAGOUDA AREGOUDAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/03/2002 BENCH:R.P. Sethi & K.G. Balakrishnan JUDGMENT:K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J.Leave granted.This appeal is preferred by the State of Karnataka against sentence impose...
Supreme Court Of India
Felix C. Okochi vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors.
Judges: M Shah, D Dharmadhikari
21 March, 2002·1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. Leave granted.3. The appellant has challenged the impugned order dated 19th December, 2001 passed by the High Court of judicature at Madras in HCP No. 1073 of 2001. By the impugned order, the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellan...
Supreme Court Of India
G.K. Bhatnagar (D) By Lrs. vs Abdul Alim
Judges: R Lahoti, R Pal
21 March, 2002·1. Late G.K. Bhatnagar, who has expired during the pendency of these proceedings and whose legal representatives have been brought on record in his place as the appellants, owned a suit shop let out to the tenant-respondent on 1/5/1966 on payment of Rs. 50/- by way of rent and Rs. 6/- by way of elec...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.