Shalini vs Kurukshetra University & Anr
Judges: R C Lahoti, K G Balakrishnan
18 January, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 544 of 2002 PETITIONER: SHALINI Vs.RESPONDENT:KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/01/2002 BENCH:R.C. Lahoti & K.G. Balakrishnan JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J.The petitioner, appeared in B.Sc. (Home Science) Part-I examination conducted by Kurukshetra University, the...
Supreme Court Of India
Om Prakash Gupta vs Ranbir B Goyal
Judges: R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
18 January, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5460 of 1999 PETITIONER:OM PRAKASH GUPTA Vs. RESPONDENT:RANBIR B. GOYAL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/01/2002 BENCH:R.C. Lahoti & Brijesh Kumar JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J.The suit premises are described as booth no.13, Sector 8, Panchkula. These premises were let out by the plaintiff-r...
Supreme Court Of India
Kathyayini Hotels Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner Of ...
Judges: S Bharucha, S V Patil, B P Singh
18 January, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. The notice on the special leave petition stated that the matter might be disposed of at this stage by setting aside the order under challenge and restoring the sales tax application to the file of the High Court to be heard and disposed of on merits.3. We have heard learned couns...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... vs Kisan Sehkari Chini Mill Ltd.
Judges: S Quadri, S Variava
18 January, 2002·JUDGMENT Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Heard Mr. Altaf Ahmad, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellants and Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, the learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the respondent.2. Leave is granted.3. This appeal is directed against the judgment and ...
Supreme Court Of India
Shilps Impex vs Union Of India
Judges: B Kirpal, K Balakrishnan
18 January, 2002·1. Delay in filing counter affidavit is condoned.2. After hearing the Counsel for the parties, it is quite evident that the petitioner-firm was entitled to receive from the respondents Rs. 4,35,000/-, being the price of the goods, Rs. 1,80,000/- which he had paid as duty, Rs. 2,00,000/- for the rede...
Supreme Court Of India
Sadanand Mishra vs Forest Research Institute And ...
Judges: R Lahoti, B Kumar
18 January, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant had passed B.Sc. in the year 1984 from the University of Allahabad with Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics as subjects. In response to an advertisement issued by Forest Research Institute at Dehradun, he made an application seeking admission for M.Sc. Environment ma...
Supreme Court Of India
Munish Chandra Goyal vs Sudesh Rani And Ors.
Judges: R Lahoti, B Kumar
18 January, 2002·1. By order dated 9.12.1998. Bar Councilof India, while holding the appellant guiltyof professional misconduct and directing hislicence for practice to be suspended for aperiod of two years, directed the appellantto deposit an amount of Rs. 11,000/- byway of costs payable to the complainants,eleven ...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaipur Zila Sah. Bhoomi Vikas Bank ... vs Shri Ram Gopal Sharma and Ors
Judges: Cji, Syed Shah Quadri, N Santosh Hegde, S N Variava, Shivaraj V Patil
17 January, 2002·Shivaraj V. Patil J.From the Order of Reference made in Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. vs. Ram Gopal Sharma and another [(1994) 6 SCC 522], the question that arises for consideration is:"If the approval is not granted under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, whether ...
Supreme Court Of India
All India Non-Sc/St Empl. Assn. ... vs V.K. Agarwal And Ors.
Judges: B Kirpal, Y Sabharwal, K Balakrishnan
17 January, 2002·1. It is indeed unfortunate that notwithstanding considerable time having elapsed orders of this Court passed from time to time have not been implemented.2. The dispute in this case arose out of O.A. No. 326/89 which was filed by the petitioner, "which is an Association of the Bikaner Division of th...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of Gwalior vs Harish Kumar
Judges: D Mohapatra, P V Reddi
17 January, 2002·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The municipal corporation of Gwalior has filed this appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in M.P. No 927 of 1990, wherein the writ petition filed by the respondent was allowed and writ of mandamus was issued to the corporation...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.