Hari Prasad vs State Of U.P.
Judges: Y Sabharwal, H Sema
07 August, 2002·1. The deceased has been killed as a result of single gun shot. According to the post mortem report, the ante-mortem injury which the deceased suffered was as under:"Gun shot wound of entry area 1 3/4" x 1 1/2" x cavity deep margins inverted lacerated blackening and tattooing present front of Abd. l...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Kumar Jha vs State Of Bihar
Judges: K B N, K Balakrishnan, A Pasayat
06 August, 2002·1. The appellant has been convicted for commission of offences punishable under Sections 376 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short "IPC") by the sessions judge, Samstipur and the said conviction has been upheld by the High Court.2. In a case where there are concurrent findings of fact, th...
Supreme Court Of India
Malla Prakasarao vs Malla Janaki And Ors.
Judges: V Khare, S V Patil, A Bhan
06 August, 2002·ORDER CA No. 1613 of 19961. It is not disputed that the driving licence of the driver of the vehicle had expired on 20-11-1982 and the driver did not apply for renewal within thirty days of the expiry of the said licence, as required under Section 11 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. It is also not d...
Supreme Court Of India
Pratap Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh
Judges: K B N, K Balakrishnan, A Pasayat
06 August, 2002·1. In the instant case, the appellant was tried for an offence under Section 307 IPC and under Sections 25/54/59 of the Indian Arms Act. After trial, the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 324 IPC after being acquitted of the offence under Section 307 IPC and Section 25 of the Ind...
Supreme Court Of India
Prakash Industries Ltd vs Development Credit Bank Ltd. and Anr
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, P Venkatarama Reddi
05 August, 2002·J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. :The respondents brought a suit on the original side of the Bombay High Court for recovery of certain sum of money against the petitioner and the Guarantor. In respect of machinery which had been stated to have been financed by the respondent-Bank a Court Receiver w...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Hira Lall and Sons and Ors vs M/S Lakhsmi Commercial Bank
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, P Venkatarama Reddi
05 August, 2002·J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. :This is a petition filed for transfer of original application No. 846 of 1996 pending before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') to the High Court of Delhi.The allegations in the application before the Tribunal are that the petit...
Supreme Court Of India
Raj Kishor Roy vs Kamleshwar Pandey & Anr
Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, S N Variava
05 August, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 755 of 2002 PETITIONER:RAJ KISHOR ROY Vs. RESPONDENT:KAMLESHWAR PANDEY & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/08/2002 BENCH:Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri & S. N. Variava.JUDGMENT:S. N. Variava, J.Leave granted.Heard parties.This Appeal is against the judgment and order dated 25th April, 200...
Supreme Court Of India
Pramodkumar Rasikbhai Jhaveri vs Karmasey Kunvargi Tak & Ors
Judges: U C Banerjee, K G Balakrishnan
05 August, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5436 of 1994 PETITIONER:PRAMODKUMAR RASIKBHAI JHAVERI Vs. RESPONDENT:KARMASEY KUNVARGI TAK & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/08/2002 BENCH:U.C. Banerjee & K.G. Balakrishnan.JUDGMENT:K.G. Balakrishnan, J.The claimant in a motor accident claim case is the appellant before us. The ap...
Supreme Court Of India
Dhruv Green Field Ltd vs Hukam Singh And Ors
Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, S N Variava
05 August, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 4565 of 2002 PETITIONER:DHRUV GREEN FIELD LTD.RESPONDENT:HUKAM SINGH AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/08/2002 BENCH:SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI & S.N. VARIAVA JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 Supp(1) SCR 449 The Judgment of the Court was delivered SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI J. Heard the learn...
Supreme Court Of India
Swaraj Tractors Division, Punjab vs Raghbir Singh
Judges: B Kirpal, K Balakrishnan, A Pasayat
05 August, 2002·1. Special leave granted.2. In the instant case, as per the judgment of the High Court, the respondent who was a workman with the appellant absented himself from duty with effect from March 27, 1991. On March 30, 1991, FIR No. 28 was registered against him under Section 302, IPC. The respondent was ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.