Maharashtra Distilleries vs M&Unaincri Pal Corporation Of Aurangabad
Judges: Cji N Santosh Hegde, Shivaraj V Patil
17 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5341 of 1996 PETITIONER:MAHARASHTRA DISTILLERIES Vs. RESPONDENT:M&UNAINCRI.PAL CORPORATION OF AURANGABAD DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/04/2002 BENCH:CJI, N. Santosh Hegde & Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT:SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J.The appellant is a company engaged in the manufacture of variou...
Supreme Court Of India
D@Hamramnesnidnrgasrianthansinh vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Brijesh Kumar
17 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 927 of 2001 PETITIONER: D@HAMRAMNESNIDNRGASRIANTHANSINH Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF GUJARAT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/04/2002 BENCH:Doraiswamy Raju & Brijesh Kumar JUDGMENT:BRIJESH KUMAR, J.This appeal has been preferred by the appellant from Jail against the judgment and order dated...
Supreme Court Of India
Raminder Singh Sethi vs D Vijayarangam
Judges: R C Lahoti, B N Agrawal
17 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 582 of 2000 PETITIONER:RAMINDER SINGH SETHI RESPONDENT:D. VIJAYARANGAM DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/04/2002 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & B.N. AGRAWAL JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 (3) SCR 213 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by The landlord/respondent filed a suit for eviction of the tenant-a...
Supreme Court Of India
Bijoy Singh & Anr vs State Of Bihar
Judges: R P Sethi, D M Dharmadhikari
17 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1339-1340 of 1999 PETITIONER:BIJOY SINGH & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF BIHAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/04/2002 BENCH:R.P. Sethi & D.M. Dharmadhikari JUDGMENT:(With Crl.A.No.1341/99) J U D G M E N T SETHI,J.Though sad, yet it is a fact that people do not hesitate in resorting to v...
Supreme Court Of India
Sinkhai Synthetics and Chemicals ... vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
16 April, 2002·1. The assessees claimed the benefit of an exemption notification. The revenue challenged the claim. The matters went higher and upto the customs, excise and gold (control) appellate tribunal, which decided in favour of the assessees. In the interregnum, the assessees paid the excise duty under prot...
Supreme Court Of India
Pradeep Kumar Biswas and Ors vs Indian Institute Of Chemical ...
Judges: R C Lahoti, Doraiswamy Raju
16 April, 2002·R.C. Lahoti, J.(for self and on behalf of Doraiswamy Raju, J.) We have had the advantage of reading the judgment proposed by our learned sister Ruma Pal, J.. With greatest respect to her, we find ourselves not persuaded to subscribe to her view overruling Sabhajit Tewary's case and holding Council f...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Mgt. Advisors and Leasing ... vs Collector Of C. Ex., Delhi
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
16 April, 2002·ORDER Civil Appeal Nos. 732-735/1995 and 499-500/20011. The question in these appeals relates to an exemption notification which contains this statement:"7. The exemption contained in this notification shall not apply to the specified goods where a manufacturer affixes the specified goods with a bra...
Supreme Court Of India
Pradeep Kumar Biswas vs IbnidoilaongyinandStoirtsu.Te; ...
Judges: Cji, Syed Shah Quadri, N Santosh Hegde, Ruma Pal, Arijit Pasayat
16 April, 2002·J U D G M EN T RUMA PAL,J In 1972 Sabhajit Tewary, a Junior Stenographer with the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution claiming parity of remuneration with the stenographers who were newly recruited to the CSIR. His claim was...
Supreme Court Of India
P. Ramachandra Rao vs State Of Karnataka
Judges: S P Bharucha Cji, S S M Quadri, R C Lahoti, N Santosh Hegde, D Raju
16 April, 2002·JUDGMENT 2002 AIR 1856 = 2002 (4)SCC 578 = 2002(4) JT 92 = 2002(3) SCALE 497 WITH Crl.Appeal Nos. 536/2000, 537/2000, 538/2000, 539/2000, 540/2000, 541/2000 & 542/2000.J U D G M E N T R.C. Lahoti, J.No person shall be deprived of his life or his personal liberty except according to procedure establi...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Supe Dei And Ors. vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. And ...
Judges: D Mohapatra, B Kumar, D Dharmadhikari
16 April, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. The claimants in this case have filed this appeal for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') assailing the judgments of the High Court of Karnataka in M.F.A. No. 4537 of 1999 (MVC) alongwith cross appeal No. 26/2000 (MVC) in which t...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.