Sahebkhan K. Malek vs Jamilasranu S. Malek And Anr.
Judges: D Mohapatra, B Kumar, D Dharmadhikari
18 April, 2002·1. We have heard Shri Aseem Mehrotra learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Smt. Jamilasranu S. Malek respondent No. 1 who appears in person and Mrs. Hemantika Wahi, learned counsel for State of Gujarat.2. The appellant and respondent No. 1 who are muslims were married on 21.2.92. A son named ...
Supreme Court Of India
Mehboob Bi vs Muhammad Abdullah (Dead) By Lrs.
Judges: R Lahoti, B Agrawal
18 April, 2002·1. A petition for eviction of the tenant under Section 10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', for short) was filed by the landlord-respondent. Initially, the rent in arrears was alleged to be for the period between 1981 and 1985...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra vs Uddhav
Judges: R Sethi, D Raju
18 April, 2002·1. For allegedly committing rape upon the person of Km. Deolabai the respondent was charged under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and after trial convicted for the commission of the said offence. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- i...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner, Central Excise, Nagpur vs Wainganga Sahkari S Karkhana Ltd
Judges: S P Bharucha Cj, N Santosh Hegde, Shivaraj V Patil
18 April, 2002·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 496 of 1998 PETITIONER:COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, NAGPUR RESPONDENT:WAINGANGA SAHKARI S. KARKHANA LTD. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/04/2002 BENCH:S.P. BHARUCHA CJ.& N. SANTOSH HEGDE & SHIVARAJ V. PATIL JUDGMEN...
Supreme Court Of India
Vijay Kumar Madan And Ors vs R N Gupta Techincal Education Society And Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti, B N Agrawal
18 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1890 of 2000 PETITIONER:VIJAY KUMAR MADAN AND ORS.RESPONDENT:R.N. GUPTA TECHINCAL EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/04/2002 BENCH:R.C. LAHOTI & B.N. AGRAWAL JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2002 (3) SCR 217 The following Judgment of the Court was delivered Certain premises sit...
Supreme Court Of India
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e6a2a6ae878b94878b888395888f828894818795948f8788928e8788958f888e">[email protected]</a> vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Brijesh Kumar
17 April, 2002·BRIJESH KUMAR, J.This appeal has been preferred by the appellant from Jail against the judgment and order dated 5th,7th and 10th July, 2001 passed by the Gujarat High Court upholding his conviction under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentence of death as awarded by the Additional Sessions Judge Sabarkantha...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of C. Ex., Bangalore vs Balakrishna Perfumary Works
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
17 April, 2002·1. The assessee makes a garbs this. The Tribunal, following its judgment in the case of Ambica Chemical Products (60 E.L.T. 656), held in favour of the assessee.2. Our attention is drawn by learned counsel for the Revenue to the findings of the Collector, Central Excise that power was used by the as...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Maheshwari Mills Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
17 April, 2002·1. We have heard learned counsel for the Revenue (Appellant) and find that the order of the Tribunal is correct. Reliance has rightly been placed, given the facts, upon the judgment of this Court in Union of India and Ors. v. Madhumilan Syntex Pvt. Ltd. (35 E.L.T. 349).2. Our attention has been draw...
Supreme Court Of India
Naharwar Engg. Works vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
17 April, 2002·1. What was argued before the High Court was this :"Sri S.P. Gupta, learned senior counsel for the petitioners contended that the value of the clearances of excisable goods in the year 1978-79 exceeded Rs. 20,00,000/- is the manifestly erroneous view of the matter inasmuch as the clubbing of clearan...
Supreme Court Of India
Dharmendrasinh @ Mansing ... vs State Of Gujarat
Judges: D Raju, B Kumar
17 April, 2002·JUDGMENT Brijesh Kumar, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant fromJail against the judgment and order dated 5th, 7th and 10th July,2001 passed by the Gujarat High Court upholding hisconviction under Section 302 I.P.C. and sentence of death asawarded by the Additional Sessions Judge Sa...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.