Secretary, Ministry Of Home ... vs Tahir Ali Khan Tyagi
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Kumar
22 April, 2002·1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted.3. The question for consideration in this appeal is whether the direction of the government to hold a departmental inquiry could rightly be interfered with by the tribunal.4. As it appears, a criminal prosecution was launched against the delinquent respondent under...
Supreme Court Of India
Rampur Engineering Co. Ltd. vs Punjab State Electricity Board ...
Judges: R Lahoti, D Raju
22 April, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. Between the parties there were arbitration proceedings wherein an award has been made under the Arbitration Act, 1940. Proceedings for making the award a rule of the court are pending in the court of additional civil judge, senior division, Patiala. Objection petition under Secti...
Supreme Court Of India
B.L. Wadhera vs Union Of India and Ors
Judges: R P Sethi, K G Balakrishnan
19 April, 2002·SETHI,J.The respondent No.7, who is admittedly a leader of national stature, a reputed Member of Parliament for years and a former Prime Minister of the country is accused of usurping about 600 acres of land in Village Bhondsi of the State of Haryana by manipulations and resort to exercise of his po...
Supreme Court Of India
V.G. Quenim And Anr. vs Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd.
Judges: V Khare, A Bhan
19 April, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. The plaintiff-respondent herein filed four separate suits for recovery of money against the defendant-appellants herein. It is alleged that, simultaneously, the plaintiff-respondent moved two sets of applications, i.e. one for grant of temporary injunction, restraining the defend...
Supreme Court Of India
Tej Ram vs Indian Overseas Bank And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Kumar
19 April, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana.3. The appellant who was an employee of Indian Overseas Bank, approached the High Court for directing the bank to allow him to be in the pension scheme in accordance with the scheme of 1994 as well...
Supreme Court Of India
Gtc Industries Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: N S Hegde, D Raju
19 April, 2002·1. By this application, the Union of India is seeking a direction to the GTC Industries Ltd. to pay the interest as directed by this Court vide order dated 4-3-1998. The application in question is opposed by the GTC Industries Ltd. on the ground that the company is now before the BIFR, hence, any cl...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajender Kumar And Ors. vs Rambhai And Ors.
Judges: D Mohapatra, B Kumar, D Dharmadhikari
18 April, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. This appeal filed by the children of the deceased Smt. Susheela Bai who died in a motor accident on 12.12.1988, is directed against the judgment rendered by a division bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh reviewing order dated 9.8.1999 and reducing the compensation awarded i...
Supreme Court Of India
Standard Radiators Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
18 April, 2002·1. We have read the order of the Tribunal and heard learned Counsel.2. We are satisfied that far greater consideration should have been given by the Tribunal to the case of the assessee than is shown by the order under challenge. The Tribunal is the last fact finding authority and it is expected tha...
Supreme Court Of India
Gupta Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr.
Judges: D Mohapatra, B Kumar, D Dharmadhikari
18 April, 2002·1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.3. In these appeals filed by the accused against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated 1.5.2001, declining to interfere with the criminal proceeding instituted against the appellant in exercise of the power under Section 482 of the C...
Supreme Court Of India
Lakshman Exports Limited vs Collector Of Central Excise
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
18 April, 2002·1. We have heard learned counsel.2. There was a difference of opinion between two Members of the Tribunal and the matter was referred to the President. The difference of opinion arose because of the findings of the Vice President of the Tribunal that the principles of natural justice had not been ob...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.