Godrej Industries Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs, Bombay
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
10 April, 2002·1. We have heard learned Counsel. It appears that the Appellate Commissioner's order, upholding the classification proposed by the Revenue, proceeds on a basis that is contrary to the finding of the Assistant Commissioner and, indeed, of the show cause notice. The Tribunal, while appreciating that a...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajendra V Pai vs Alex Fernandes & Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti, P Venkatarama Reddi
09 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6142-6144 of 2001 PETITIONER:RAJENDRA V. PAI Vs. RESPONDENT:ALEX FERNANDES & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/04/2002 BENCH:R.C. Lahoti & P. Venkatarama Reddi JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J.The appellant, an advocate on the rolls of the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, has been found g...
Supreme Court Of India
Moti Lal vs Central Bureau Of Investigation & Anr
Judges: M B Shah, B N Agrawal
09 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 476 of 2002 PETITIONER: MOTI LAL Vs.RESPONDENT:CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/04/2002 BENCH:M.B. Shah & B.N. Agrawal JUDGMENT:Shah, J.Leave granted.The short question involved in this appeal iswhether the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was...
Supreme Court Of India
Farooq @ Karattaa Farooq & Ors vs State Of Kerala
Judges: M B Shah, B N Agrawal
09 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 656-57 of 2001 Appeal (crl.) 1049-50 of 2001 PETITIONER:FAROOQ @ KARATTAA FAROOQ & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF KERALA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/04/2002 BENCH:M.B. Shah & B.N. Agrawal JUDGMENT:B.N.AGRAWAL, J.Criminal Appeal Nos. 656-57 of 2001 are by four appellants, namely, Faro...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of C. Ex., Shillong vs Woodcraft Products Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, S V Patil
09 April, 2002·1. The Revenue is in appeal against an order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal.2. The assessee manufactures block board. It submitted a classification list classifying block board under Tariff Entry 4410.90 attracting 'nil' rate of duty. The Assistant Commissioner did not ...
Supreme Court Of India
Shyam Lal vs Rasool Ahmed (Dead) By Lrs.
Judges: R Lahoti, B Agrawal
09 April, 2002·1. The suit premises are non-residential situated in Sitapur city of the State of Uttar Pradesh. Proceedings for eviction of tenant were initiated by the landlord in the court of munsif exercising small causes jurisdiction on the ground available under Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of t...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashok Bimal Ghosh vs Smt. Beant Kaur
Judges: R Lahoti, B Agrawal
09 April, 2002·1. In the suit premises described as C-646, New Friends Colony, New Delhi, the appellant was inducted by the respondent as a tenant for residential purpose on a monthly rent of Rs. 11,500/- w.e.f. 1.8.1994. The terms and conditions of the lease are contained in the deed of lease dated 31.7.1984 exec...
Supreme Court Of India
R V E Venkatachala Gounder vs Venkatesha Gupta & Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti, P Venkatarama Reddi
09 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 3345-3349 of 1998 PETITIONER:R.V.E. VENKATACHALA GOUNDER Vs. RESPONDENT:VENKATESHA GUPTA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/04/2002 BENCH:R.C. Lahoti & P. Venkatarama Reddi JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J.The suit property consists of a building situated on Easvarankoil Street of Tirupur c...
Supreme Court Of India
Rachapalli Abbulu & Ors vs State Of A P
Judges: R P Sethi, K G Balakrishnan
08 April, 2002·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 685-686 of 1992 PETITIONER:RACHAPALLI ABBULU & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF A.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/04/2002 BENCH:R.P. Sethi & K.G. Balakrishnan JUDGMENT:K.G. Balakrishnan, J.18 persons were charge-sheeted before the Court of Sessions, East Godavari Division at Rajahmundry i...
Supreme Court Of India
Bipin Kumar Baidya vs State Of Bihar And Ors.
Judges: V Khare, K Balakrishnan
08 April, 2002·1. Leave granted2. The appellant herein was appointed as a clerk in the education department in the State of Bihar. The services of the appellant as well as similarly situated 12 other clerks were terminated by a composite order dated 14.5.1997, The other clerks whose services were terminated filed ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.