Commissioner Of Customs (Sea), ... vs Ballarpur Industries Ltd
Judges: B N Kirpal, K G Balakrishnan, P Venkatarama Reddy
11 September, 2001·JUDGMENT 2001 Supp(3) SCR 24 The following Order of the Court was delivered :In the instant case, some goods were imported by the respondent under three bills of entry. The claim of the respondent was that what was imported were essentially accessories and under an exemption notification no customs ...
Supreme Court Of India
Indo Asahi Glass Co. Ltd. And Anr. vs Income-Tax Officer And Ors.
Judges: B Kirpal, K Balakrishnan, P V Reddi
11 September, 2001·1. This appeal arises from the judgment of the Calcutta High Court (see [1996] 222 ITR 534) which had dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants wherein challenge was made to the show-cause notice dated May 16, 1996.2. The aforesaid show-cause notice was issued on the allegation that salary...
Supreme Court Of India
Latel vs State Of Chhattisgarh
Judges: U C Banerjee, N Santosh Hegde
11 September, 2001·SANTOSH HEGDE, J.The appellant herein was accused No.1 in Sessions Trial No.39/93 before the III Additional Sessions Judge of Sessions Court, Bilaspur (M.P.). He along with 11 other persons were charged under Sections 148, 302 and 307 read with Section 149 IPC for having committed the murder of Sahd...
Supreme Court Of India
Latel vs State Of Chhattisgarh
Judges: U C Banerjee, N Santosh Hegde
11 September, 2001·SANTOSH HEGDE, J.The appellant herein was accused No.1 in Sessions Trial No.39/93 before the III Additional Sessions Judge of Sessions Court, Bilaspur (M.P.). He along with 11 other persons were charged under Sections 148, 302 and 307 read with Section 149 IPC for having committed the murder of Sahd...
Supreme Court Of India
S. Pitchai Ganapathy and Ors vs Commissioner
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, S N Variava
10 September, 2001·J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. :This appeal by special leave is against the judgment in Letters Patent Appeal No. 206 of 1992 on the file of the High Court of Madras. The question raised in this appeal is as to whether the temples of the Madurai Veerasami and 18 Padi Karupannasami Temple are priv...
Supreme Court Of India
Ircon International Ltd. vs Daya Shankar And Anr.
Judges: B Kirpal, N S Hegde, S Variava
10 September, 2001·ORDER B.N. Kirpal, N. Santosh Hedge and S.N. Variava, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. The respondent, as is evident from the facts which emanate from the record, was appointed in a project of the appellant, namely, the Ballast project of the Northern Railways. He was appointed as a khalasi and no for...
Supreme Court Of India
S. Pitchai Ganapathy And Ors. vs Commissioner, Hindu Religious ...
Judges: S R Babu, S Variava
10 September, 2001·ORDER Rajendra Babu, J.1. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment in Letters Patent Appeal No. 206 of 1992 on the file of the High Court of Madras. The question raised in this appeal is as to whether the temples of the Madurai Veerasami and 18 Padi Karupannasami Temple are 'private temp...
Supreme Court Of India
K.L. Nandakumaran Nair vs K.I. Philip And Ors
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy Raju
10 September, 2001·JUDGMENT 2001 Supp(3) SCR 14 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJENDRA BABU, J. These appeals arise out of certain proceedings in O.A. No. 418/94 filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal'). Respondent Nos. 1 to 4, who were ...
Supreme Court Of India
Hussan Mithu Mhasvadkar vs Bombay Iron & Steel Labour Board & Anr
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy Raju
07 September, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 11189 of 1995 PETITIONER:HUSSAN MITHU MHASVADKAR Vs. RESPONDENT:BOMBAY IRON & STEEL LABOUR BOARD & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/09/2001 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu & Doraiswamy Raju JUDGMENT:Raju, J.The two important questions that are put in issue in this appeal are as to:a) Wheth...
Supreme Court Of India
Sri Kant Tripathi & Ors vs State Of U P & Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik, Ruma Pal
07 September, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5908 of 1997 PETITIONER:SRI KANT TRIPATHI & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF U.P. & ORS..DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/09/2001 BENCH:G.B. Pattanaik & Ruma Pal JUDGMENT:WITH W.P. (C) NO. 394/94, W.P. NO. (C) 592/94, C.A. NO. 1656/2001, C.A. 1657/2001, W.P.(C) 460/1999, C.A.NOS.1669-1680/2...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.