Punjab and Sindh Bank vs Vinkar Sahakari Bank Ltd And Ors
Judges: K T Thomas, S N Variava
17 September, 2001·THOMAS, J.Leave granted.This case involves a queer situation when a Pay Order was dishonoured by the drawer bank. The holder thereof (Punjab and Singh Bank) filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 (for short the Act). The drawer bank and its officials have been arr...
Supreme Court Of India
Vinod Tanna And Anr. vs Zaheer Siddiqui And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, R Pal
17 September, 2001·ORDER G.B. Pattanaik, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Bombay High Court refusing the prayer of the accused to quash the criminal proceedings. A proceedings had been initiated under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for shor...
Supreme Court Of India
Baldev Raj Taneja vs Bimal Kumar Kejriwal (Huf) and Ors
Judges: D P Mohapatra, K G Balakrishnan
14 September, 2001·D E R This Special Leave Petition has been filed by the complainant against the revisional order dated 21st March, 1997 of the High Court of Calcutta in Criminal Revision No.194 of 1997 in which the learned single Judge (Justice S.K.Tiwari) while confirming the order of the learned Magistrate refusi...
Supreme Court Of India
Sua Explosives and Accessories Ltd. ... vs S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. And Ors.
Judges: S Quadri, S Phukan
14 September, 2001·JUDGMENT Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Heard Mr. R.F. Nariman, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and Mr. C.S. Vidyanathan, learned senior counsel for the caveator/respondents.2. With regard to the same subject matter the parties are litigating in different courts. Whereas the petitioners'...
Supreme Court Of India
J.J. Enterprises vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: S Bharucha, Y Sabharwal
14 September, 2001·1. Leave granted.The Tribunal had declined to make a reference, at the instance of the Revenue, of the following question :"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in upholding the deletion of Rs. 19,66,550 instead of setting ...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Indseam Services Ltd vs Bimal Kumar Kejriwal ( Huf )
Judges: D P Mohapatra, K G Balakrishnan
14 September, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 941 of 2001 PETITIONER:M/S INDSEAM SERVICES LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:BIMAL KUMAR KEJRIWAL (HUF) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/09/2001 BENCH:D.P.MOHAPATRA & K.G.BALAKRISHNAN JUDGMENT:D.P. Mohapatra,J.Leave granted.M/s Indseam Services Limited, an accused in complaint case No.C.1628/96 pendi...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Bihar vs Laloo Prasad Alias Laloo Prasad ...
Judges: K Thomas, S Variava
14 September, 2001·1. Leave granted.2. A witness was sought to be treated as hostile by a public prosecutor on the ground that he gave answers in favour of the defence during cross-examination. The trial judge declined to permit the public prosecutor to cross examine the witness as per an order passed by him. The C.B....
Supreme Court Of India
Dwarika Prasad Tiwari vs M P State Road Transport Corporation & Anr
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, S N Variava
13 September, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 636 of 1998 PETITIONER:DWARIKA PRASAD TIWARI Vs. RESPONDENT:M.P. STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/09/2001 BENCH:S. RAJENDRA BABU & S.N. VARIAVA JUDGMENT:[WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2372-2373/1999 AND 2375-2378/1999] J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. ...
Supreme Court Of India
Sukhdev Yadav And Ors vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Umesh C Banerjee, N Santosh Hegde
13 September, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 482 of 2000 PETITIONER:SUKHDEV YADAV AND ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF BIHAR DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/09/2001 BENCH:Umesh C Banerjee & N. Santosh Hegde JUDGMENT:BANERJEE, J.It is now well-settled that the Court can sift the chaff from the grain and find out the truth from the test...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Customs, Madras vs A-One Electronics
Judges: B Kirpal, N S Hegde, P V Reddi
13 September, 2001·1. The respondent imported 1000 pieces of down converters from Singapore. According to the bill of entry which was filed, it was stated that the country of origin of the goods was Singapore and the price at which the goods were to be cleared for consumption was declared at US $ 4.25 per piece.2. The...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.