Jasbir Rani & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr
Judges: D P Mohapatra, Shivaraj V Patil
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7304 of 2001 Appeal (civil) 7305 of 2001 Writ Petition (civil) 521 of 2000 PETITIONER:JASBIR RANI & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:D.P. Mohapatra & Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT:D.P.MOHAPATRA,J.Leave granted in both the special ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Bihar vs Baidnath Prasad @ Baidyanath Shah And Anr
Judges: K T Thomas, S N Variava
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1075 of 2001 Special Leave Petition (crl.) 1116 of 2001 PETITIONER:STATE OF BIHAR Vs. RESPONDENT:BAIDNATH PRASAD @ BAIDYANATH SHAH AND ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:K.T.Thomas, S.N.Variava JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.Leave granted.The accused persons who succeeded greatly...
Supreme Court Of India
Gulam Hussain Shaikh Chougule vs S Reynolds, Suptd Of Customs, Marmgoa
Judges: D P Mohapatra K G Balakrishnan
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1080 of 2001 PETITIONER:GULAM HUSSAIN SHAIKH CHOUGULE Vs. RESPONDENT:S.REYNOLDS, SUPTD. OF CUSTOMS, MARMGOA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:D.P. Mohapatra K.G. Balakrishnan JUDGMENT:D.P.MOHAPATRA,J.Leave granted.Faced with dismissal of the revision application filed by hi...
Supreme Court Of India
State ( Delhi Administration ) vs Dharampal@
Judges: K T Thomas, S N Variava
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1076 of 2001 Special Leave Petition (crl.) 1617 of 2001 PETITIONER:STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION)..Vs. RESPONDENT:DHARAMPAL@ DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:K.T.Thomas, S.N.Variava JUDGMENT:S. N. VARIAVA, J.Leave granted. Heard parties.These appeals are against the Judgm...
Supreme Court Of India
Bansilal & Others vs Mohammad Israil & Ors
Judges: D P Mohapatra, K G Balakrishnan
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 927 of 1991 PETITIONER:BANSILAL & OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:MOHAMMAD ISRAIL & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:D.P. Mohapatra & K.G. Balakrishnan JUDGMENT:D.P. Mohapatra,J.One Sheikh Ibrahim executed two mortgage deeds on 30.4.1923 and 9.4.1924 in respect of 4.00 acres an...
Supreme Court Of India
V Purushotham Rao vs Union Of India & Ors
Judges: G B Pattanaik, Ruma Pal
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 3100 of 2000 PETITIONER:V. PURUSHOTHAM RAO Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:G.B. Pattanaik & Ruma Pal JUDGMENT:With Civil Appeal Nos. 3104-3105, 3089, 3090, 3117, 3097, 3102, 3086, 3106, 3085, 3094, 3099, 3103, 3092 & 3101 of 2000. JUDG...
Supreme Court Of India
Gurmit Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: R C Lahoti, P Venkatarama Reddi
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 283 of 2001 PETITIONER:GURMIT SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:R.C. Lahoti & P. Venkatarama Reddi JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J.Ajit Singh and his three sons Kulwant Singh, Gurmit Singh and Mangal Singh were tried on charges under Sections 30...
Supreme Court Of India
Veerayee Ammal vs Seeni Ammal
Judges: R P Sethi, S V Patil
19 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7185 of 1997 PETITIONER:VEERAYEE AMMAL Vs. RESPONDENT:SEENI AMMAL DATE OF JUDGMENT: 19/10/2001 BENCH:R.P.Sethi, S.V.Patil JUDGMENT:SETHI,J.Concurrent findings of fact were set aside by the High Court vide the judgment impugned in this appeal by holding that the alleged subs...
Supreme Court Of India
State (Delhi Administration) vs <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="42062a2330232f32232e02">[email protected]</a>
Judges: K T Thomas, S N Variava
19 October, 2001·S. N. VARIAVA, J.Leave granted.Heard parties.These appeals are against the Judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 20th November, 2000. By this Judgment a number of appeals, filed by the appellants herein, have been dismissed. All these appeals are against the said common Judgment. They are based on ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Gujarat Heavy Chemicals Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, Y Sabharwal, B Kumar
18 October, 2001·1. We have read the order of the High Court and heard learned counsel for the appellant. We are satisfied that upon the facts, no interference with the order of the High Court is called for. The civil appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs....
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.