P. Chhaganlal Daga vs M. Sanjay Shaw
Judges: K Thomas, S Variava
05 October, 2001·1. Leave granted.2. It is very unfortunate that the High Court by the impugned judgment has interfered with an order passed by a trial magistrate permitting the complainant to produce a document though at the fag end of the trial.3. In a prosecution launched by the appellant under Section 138 of the...
Supreme Court Of India
Tatoba Bhau Savagave ( D ) By Lrs & Anr vs Vasantrao Dhindiraj Deshpande & Ors
Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, S N Phukan
05 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1809 of 1992 PETITIONER:TATOBA BHAU SAVAGAVE (D) BY LRS. & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:VASANTRAO DHINDIRAJ DESHPANDE & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/10/2001 BENCH:Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri & S.N. Phukan JUDGMENT:SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI, J.This appeal by special leave is filed by the t...
Supreme Court Of India
C B I, A H D, Patna vs Braj Bhushan Prasad & Ors
Judges: K T Thomas Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, U C Banerjee
05 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1009-1010 of 2001 Appeal (crl.) 1013-1014 of 2001 PETITIONER:C.B.I., A.H.D., PATNA Vs. RESPONDENT:BRAJ BHUSHAN PRASAD & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/10/2001 BENCH:K.T. Thomas, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri & U.C. Banerjee JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.Leave granted.The question is short bu...
Supreme Court Of India
Umashankar vs State Of Chhattisgarh
Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, S N Phukan
05 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1024 of 2001 PETITIONER:UMASHANKAR RESPONDENT:STATE OF CHHATTISGARH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/10/2001 BENCH:SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI & S.N. PHUKAN JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2001 Supp(3) SCR 646 The following Order of the Court was delivered :Leave is granted.The convict, in Session Trial ...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Overseas Bank vs Indian Overseas Bank Officers Association & Anr
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy
04 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2597 of 1998 Appeal (civil) 2598 of 1998 Appeal (civil) 2599 of 1998 PETITIONER:INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK Vs. RESPONDENT:INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK OFFICERS ASSOCIATION & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/10/2001 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu & Doraiswamy JUDGMENT:Raju, J.The above appeals have be...
Supreme Court Of India
Chairman & Managing Director, India Airlines vs Binod Kumar Sinha & Ors
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy Raju
04 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1458 of 1994 PETITIONER:CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, INDIA AIRLINES Vs. RESPONDENT:BINOD KUMAR SINHA & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/10/2001 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu & Doraiswamy Raju JUDGMENT:[ WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1459-1459A/94] J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. :These appeal...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan & Anr vs M/S D P Metals
Judges: B N Kirpal N Santosh Hegde, B N Agrawal
04 October, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5085 of 2000 PETITIONER:STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:M/S D.P. METALS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/10/2001 BENCH:B.N. Kirpal, N. Santosh Hegde & B.N. Agrawal JUDGMENT:W I T H C.A. Nos. 5086, 5087, 5088, 5763, 5764 of 2000 and 1321, 1736, 1737, 1738, 1739, 1740, 1741, 1742...
Supreme Court Of India
Chitranjan Burman vs Om Prakash Bajoria And Ors
Judges: Syed Shah Quadri, S N Phukan
04 October, 2001·JUDGMENT 2001 Supp(3) SCR 600 The following Order of the Court was delivered :These two appeals, by special leave, are from the judgment of the High Court of Patna, Ranchi Bench, in Second Appeal No. 29 of 1980 dated September 30, 1997. They arise under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) C...
Supreme Court Of India
Amarjeet Singh vs State Of Maharashtra
Judges: R Lahoti, A Bhan
04 October, 2001·1. The accused-appellant has been held guilty of an offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh) and in default of fine, to undergo further R...
Supreme Court Of India
Government Of Nct Delhi and Ors vs All India Central Civil Accounts, ...
Judges: S Rajendra Babu, Doraiswamy Raju
03 October, 2001·RAJENDRA BABU, J. :This is a matter which ought to have been resolved by respondent No.8 and the appellants and unnecessary litigation is being resorted to by all the parties.By the Constitution (7th Amendment) Act, 1956, the States in Part C and Territories in Part D of the First Schedule were repl...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.