Ugar Sugar Works Ltd vs Delhi Administration And Ors
Judges: A S Anand C J, R C Lahoti, Shivaraj V Patil
22 March, 2001·CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 321 of 2000 PETITIONER:UGAR SUGAR WORKS LTD.RESPONDENT:DELHI ADMINISTRATION AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/03/2001 BENCH:DR. A.S. ANAND C.J. & R.C. LAHOTI & SHIVARAJ V. PATIL JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2001 (2) SCR 630 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. A.S. ANAND, C...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt Akhtari Bi vs State Of M P
Judges: K T Thomas, R P Sethi
22 March, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 320 of 2001 PETITIONER:SMT.AKHTARI BI Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF M.P.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/03/2001 BENCH:K.T. Thomas & R.P. Sethi.JUDGMENT:SETHI,J.Leave granted.L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J For the murder of her daughter-in-law, Prem Bai, the appellan...
Supreme Court Of India
Kandaswamy vs Bd Of Management H S I Said Mosque
Judges: D P Mohapatra, Brijesh Kumar
22 March, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 2303 of 2001 PETITIONER:KANDASWAMY RESPONDENT:Bd. OF MANAGEMENT H.S.I. SAID MOSQUE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/03/2001 BENCH:D.P. MOHAPATRA & BRIJESH KUMAR JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2001 (2) SCR 677 The Order of the Court was delivered by D.P. MOHAPATRA, J. Leave granted.The decision in thi...
Supreme Court Of India
Sucha Singh vs State Of Punjab
Judges: K T Thomas, R P Sethi
22 March, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 24 of 2001 PETITIONER:SUCHA SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF PUNJAB DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/03/2001 BENCH:K.T. Thomas & R.P. Sethi JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J.@@ JJJJJJJJJJ L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J During the months when insurgency in the State of Punjab was...
Supreme Court Of India
Shahnas Trading Co. And Ors. vs State Of Kerala And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, R Lahoti, Y Sabharwal
22 March, 2001·1. We see no reason to interfere with the judgment and order under appeal which, in turn, has followed an earlier decision of the High Court in E.K. Hajee Mohammed Meera Sahib & Sons v. Sales Tax Officer, II Circle, Trivandrum [1992] 86 STC 99 (Ker). We find no merit in the submission that the words...
Supreme Court Of India
G.M. (Personnel Wing), Canara ... vs M. Raja Rao
Judges: G Pattanaik, S Phukan, B Agrawal
22 March, 2001·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of Karnataka High Court. By the impugned judgment the Division Bench of High Court came to hold that the order of termination of the respondent after finding him guilty of charges leveled against him is unsustainable. But instead ...
Supreme Court Of India
C.S.H.A. University And Anr. vs B.D. Goyal
Judges: G Pattanaik, S Phukan, B Agrawal
22 March, 2001·ORDER G.B. Pattanalk, S.N. Phukan and B.N. Agrawal, JJ.1. Defendant University Is in appeal against the judgment of the learned single Judge of Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissing the defendant's Second Appeal R.S.A. No. 564 of 1998. The plaintiff had been appointed as a clerk in the University...
Supreme Court Of India
Property Owners' Association and ... vs State Of Maharashtra and Ors.
Judges: B Kirpal, S M Quadri, M Shah, M R Pal, K Balakrishnan
21 March, 2001·1. In these cases the main challenge is to the constitutional validity of Chapter - VIIIA which was inserted in 1986 in the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 which, inter alia, provided for the acquisition of certain properties on payment of hundred times the monthly rent for the pr...
Supreme Court Of India
Itc Bhadrachalam Paper Boards ... vs State Of A.P.
Judges: S Bharucha, N S Hegde, Y Sabharwal
21 March, 2001·1. We have heard learned counsel and find no good reason to differ from the view of the High Court in regard to the first question which reads thus :"(1) Whether coal and coal-ash (cinder) are to be treated as the same commodity or as different commodities for the purpose of taxation under the Andhr...
Supreme Court Of India
Industrial Assistance Group ... vs Shri Ashutosh Ahluwalia And Anr.
Judges: S R Babu, S Variava
21 March, 2001·JUDGMENT S. N. Variava, J.1. This Appeal is against an Order dated 24th December, 1998 passed by the Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission).2. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:3. Sometime in September/October 1994 the 2nd Respondent iss...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.