H F Sangati vs R G High Court Of Karnataka & Ors
Judges: Cji R C Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar
23 February, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1463 of 2001 Appeal (civil) 1464 of 2001 PETITIONER:H.F. SANGATI Vs. RESPONDENT:R.G. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/02/2001 BENCH:CJI, R.C. Lahoti & Brijesh Kumar JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J. L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J Leave ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramashraya & Anr vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Judges: U C Banerjee, K G Balakrishnan
23 February, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 132-134 of 2000 PETITIONER:RAMASHRAYA & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/02/2001 BENCH:U.C. Banerjee & K.G. Balakrishnan JUDGMENT:K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J. L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J The appellants herein challenge th...
Supreme Court Of India
Kasturi Bai & Ors vs Anguri Chaudhary
Judges: D P Mohapatra, S N Variava
23 February, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1466 of 2001 PETITIONER:KASTURI BAI & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:ANGURI CHAUDHARY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/02/2001 BENCH:D.P. Mohapatra & S.N. Variava JUDGMENT:D E R L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J Leave granted.The defendant in the civil suit No.2-A of 1993 ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U P And Anr vs Lalsaram
Judges: G B Pattanaik, U C Banerjee
23 February, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 4040 of 1999 PETITIONER:STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.RESPONDENT:LALSARAM DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/02/2001 BENCH:G.B. PATTANAIK & U.C. BANERJEE JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2001 (2) SCR 108 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BANERJEE, J. The challenge in this appeal, by the grant of special...
Supreme Court Of India
N.K. Pankajakshan Nair vs P.V. Jayaraj And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Agrawal
23 February, 2001·1. Leave granted.2. These two appeals are directed against the Division Bench judgment of the Kerala High Court.3. The question for consideration is whether under the statutory rule the appellant has a right of consideration for promotion to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) and if s...
Supreme Court Of India
S.A. Nanjundeswara vs M.S. Varlak Agrotech Pvt. Ltd.
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Agrawal
23 February, 2001·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant has filed this appeal against the order of the High Court quashing a complaint proceeding exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. On the basis of a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after examining ...
Supreme Court Of India
Tek Chand & Ors vs Deep Chand & Ors
Judges: U C Banerjee, K G Balakrishnan
23 February, 2001·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 4574 of 1998 PETITIONER:TEK CHAND & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:DEEP CHAND & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 23/02/2001 BENCH:U.C. Banerjee & K.G. Balakrishnan JUDGMENT: L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J.Defendants 5 to 8 in a suit for specific per...
Supreme Court Of India
Mgt. Of Som Vihar Apt. Owners ... vs Workmen, Indian Engg. and General ...
Judges: S R Babu, S Phukan
22 February, 2001·1. An award was made by the Industrial Tribunal, Tis Hazari on a reference made to it on following question :"Whether the workmen are entitled to Dearness Allowance, House Rent Allowance, Conveyance Allowance and Uniforms and if so, to what extent and from which date directions are necessary in this...
Supreme Court Of India
The Commissioner Of Income Tax, ... vs Smt. Sandhya Rani Dutta
Judges: Y K Sabharwal, S N Hegde, S P Bharucha
22 February, 2001·Bharucha, J.L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T..J These appeals arise from a judgment delivered by the High Court at Patna (Ranchi Bench) on an income tax reference at the instance of the Revenue. The three questions the High Court was called upon to consider read thus: (i) Wh...
Supreme Court Of India
Narottam Prasad Gautam vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Agrawal
22 February, 2001·ORDER G.B. Pattanaik and B. N. Agrawal, JJ.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court in Writ Petition No. 548 of 1983. The appellant had been appointed as a constable in U. P. Police in the year 1968. While he was continuing as such, his services stood terminated by...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.