National Human Rights Commission vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: S Quadri, S Phukan
22 September, 2000·1. A statement has been placed before us made by the National Human Rights Commission stating, inter alia, that it had made comprehensive recommendations for amendments in the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 and which are under consideration of the Government of India for taking further steps.2...
Supreme Court Of India
Sunderlal vs State Of M.P.
Judges: K Thomas, R Sethi
22 September, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant was the 2nd accused in a case. He was convicted along with 1st accused for the offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 and appellant was further convicted under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The conviction with the help of Section 34 cannot be upheld ...
Supreme Court Of India
Election Commission Of India vs Union Of India and Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, Y Sabharwal, R Pal
21 September, 2000·ORDER I.A. No. 5 of 2000 in W.P. (C) No. 606 of 1993:1. As between the Election Commission of India and the Union of India (the petitioner and the first respondent to the writ petition), it is agreed that the writ petition be disposed of in terms of the Terms of Settlement recorded in paragraph (3) ...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax vs Shilaben Family Trust And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, Y Sabharwal, R Pal
21 September, 2000·1. The High Court answered the following question in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee :"Whether the Tribunal is right in law and on facts in directing that the value of unquoted shares of Cadila Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. be worked out as per Rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, as interp...
Supreme Court Of India
Air India Ltd. vs Dharmender Kumar
Judges: S R Babu, D Mohapatra
21 September, 2000·ORDER S. Rajendra Babu and D.P. Mohapatra, JJ.1. A writ petition was filed by the respondent in the High Court seeking for a declaration that the contemplated action of the appellant before us in terminating the service of the respondent on January 27, 1996 or on any other subsequent date thereto is...
Supreme Court Of India
Shri B S Khurana And Others vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Others
Judges: M B Shah, S N Variava
21 September, 2000·CASE NO.:Special Leave Petition (civil) 13639 of 2000 PETITIONER:SHRI B.S. KHURANA AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/09/2000 BENCH:M.B. Shah & S.N. Variava.and 14619 of 2000.Shah, J. L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T....
Supreme Court Of India
Janatha Bazar ( South Kanara Central vs
Judges: M B Shah, D P Mohapatra
21 September, 2000·CASE NO.:Special Leave Petition (civil) 13668-13669 of 1999 PETITIONER:JANATHA BAZAR (SOUTH KANARA CENTRAL Vs. RESPONDENT:VS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/09/2000 BENCH:M.B. Shah, & D.P. Mohapatra.JUDGMENT:Shah, J.Leave granted.Heard learned counsel for the parties exhaustively. L...I...T.......T.......T.....
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs Sita Ram Jindal
Judges: S P Bharucha, Y K Sabharwal, R Pal
21 September, 2000·1. Four questions were before the High Court in a reference Under Section 127 of the Wealth Tax Act at the instance of the Revenue. They read thus:(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that in valuing shares under Rule 1D of the Wealth...
Supreme Court Of India
Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. ... vs Jitendra Pd. Singh And Anr.
Judges: S R Babu, D Mohapatra
20 September, 2000·ORDER S. Rajendra Babu and D.P. Mohapatra, JJ.1. These appeals are filed in a proceeding arising out of a reference to the Labour Court on the allegation that certain acts of the first respondent in an incident that took place on April 14, 1985, amounted to misconduct under Standing Order 24 (XIV) o...
Supreme Court Of India
B.T. Patil and Sons vs Commissioner Of Gift Tax, ...
Judges: S Bharucha, S Phukan, Y Sabharwal
20 September, 2000·ORDER S.P. Bharucha, S.N. Phukan and Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.1. The High Court answered the following question in the affirmative and against the assessee:Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the distribution of the plant and machinery belongi...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.