Hindustan Wire Products Ltd. vs Jaspal Singh And Ors.
Judges: S R Babu, S Variava
16 November, 2000·1. 219 workmen were retrenched by the appellant - company. 108 workmen challenged the same by raising an industrial dispute which was referred for adjudication to labour court. By a common Award made on 3.8.1987 the labour court rejected the reference. 28 workmen preferred three sets of petitions be...
Supreme Court Of India
U.S.P. Srivastava vs Vinoba Bhave University And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Agrawal
15 November, 2000·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Patna High Court affirming the decision of the learned Single Judge of the said High Court. The appellant had been appointed as a Reader under a scheme called "Merit Promotion of Lecturers as Readers". Under the provision o...
Supreme Court Of India
Regional Director, Esic vs Katihar Mazdoor Sangh And Anr.
Judges: S R Babu, S Variava
15 November, 2000·ORDER S. Rajendra Babu, J.1. In these two appeals the order called in question is passed by the High Court in a proceeding arising under Article 226 of the Constitution wherein a memorandum issued by the appellant directing office for payment of benefits not in cash but by way of cheque was challeng...
Supreme Court Of India
Jeet Singh And Anr. vs State Of Punjab
Judges: K Thomas, R Sethi
15 November, 2000·1. The two appellants have been convicted by a Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short 'TADA') for the offence under Section 5 of TADA. This appeal is filed by them as of right. We heard Mr. M.S. Gujral, learned senior Advocate and Mr. Rajiv D...
Supreme Court Of India
Aditya Cement vs Commercial Taxes Officer, ...
Judges: B Kirpal, N S Hegde, D Raju
15 November, 2000·1. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties, we are, of the opinion that the judgment of the High Court (Commercial Taxes Officer v. Aditya Cement) is correct and calls for no interference. It is quite apparent from a reading of the "Rajasthan Sales Tax New Deferment Scheme for Industries, 1989...
Supreme Court Of India
Saju vs State Of Kerala
Judges: K T Thomas, R P Sethi
15 November, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 699 1998 PETITIONER: SAJU Vs.RESPONDENT:STATE OF KERALA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/11/2000 BENCH:K.T.Thomas, R.P.Sethi JUDGMENT: L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J SETHI, J.Ms.Jameela a young muslim woman was found killed on 18.9.1991 by Baiju, allegedly hir...
Supreme Court Of India
East India Hotels Ltd And Anr vs Union Of India And Anr
Judges: B N Kirpal, N Santosh Hegde, Dora1 Swamy Raju
15 November, 2000·ï»¿CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5086 of 1989 PETITIONER:EAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ANR.RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/11/2000 BENCH:B.N. KIRPAL & N. SANTOSH HEGDE & DORA1SWAMY RAJU JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 Supp(4) SCR 658 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KIRPAL, J. This ap...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Gujarat-I vs Navnit Lal Sakar Lal Etc
Judges: S P Bharucha, D P Mohapatra
15 November, 2000·ï»¿CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7723 of 1997 PETITIONER:COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, GUJARAT-I RESPONDENT:NAVNIT LAL SAKAR LAL ETC. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/11/2000 BENCH:S.P. BHARUCHA & D.P. MOHAPATRA JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 Supp(4) SCR 652 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BHARUCHA, J. We are concer...
Supreme Court Of India
Kshetriya Kisan Gramin Bank vs D B Sharma And Ors
Judges: U C Banerjee, G B Pattanaik
15 November, 2000·PETITIONER:KSHETRIYA KISAN GRAMIN BANK Vs. RESPONDENT:D.B. SHARMA AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/11/2000 BENCH:U.C.Banerjee, G.B.Pattanaik JUDGMENT: L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J PATTANAIK,J.The appellant is a Regional Rural Bank, established under Section 3 of the Region...
Supreme Court Of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs K. Anita Reddy And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, D Mohapatra
15 November, 2000·1. Having heard learned counsel, we are of the view that the judgment of this court by a Bench of two learned judges in Union of India v. S. Muthyam Reddy [1999] 240 ITR 341 requires consideration by a larger Bench.2. The civil appeals shall be placed before a Bench of three learned judges....
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.