Vijay Amba Das Diware and Ors vs Balkrishna Wamaii Dande and Aiir
Judges: Syed Shah Quadri, S N Phukan
31 March, 2000·PHUKAN. J.The landlord filed an application under Items (i) and(ii) of sub-clause (3) of Clause 13 of The Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 (for short the Order) before the Controller which was allowed and the controller granted permission to the landlord to ...
Supreme Court Of India
Vijay Amba Das Diware and Ors vs Balkrishna Wamaii Dande and Aiir
Judges: Syed Shah Quadri, S N Phukan
31 March, 2000·PHUKAN. J.L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T..J The landlord filed an application under Items (i) and(ii) of sub-clause (3) of Clause 13 of The Central Provinces and Berar Letting of Houses and Rent Control Order, 1949 (for short the Order) before the Controller which was allo...
Supreme Court Of India
Ashoka Dutta Gupta And Anr. vs Sujit Dutta Gupta and Anr.
Judges: K Thomas, D Mohapatra
31 March, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. First appellant is the wife and second appellant is the child of the first respondent. On behalf of both the appellants first appellant moved an application under Section 125 of the CrPC for maintenance allowance. The Magistrate before whom the motion was made granted Rs. 1000/- ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ispat Industries Ltd. And Another vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: D P Wadhwa, A P Misra
31 March, 2000·D.P. WADHWA,J.Petitioners seek leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution from the judgment dated February 3, 2000 of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court.First petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of steel. Second petitioner is a shareholder of the first petitioner and is also a...
Supreme Court Of India
Anil Kumar Puri vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court, ...
Judges: S Majmudar, Y Sabharwal
31 March, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant and learned Counsel for respondent No. 2 finally in this appeal. Respondent No. 1 is a pro forma party.3. The appellant's grievance is that when his termination dated 20.10.1989 was set aside by the Labour Court on account of the fi...
Supreme Court Of India
Economic Transport Organisation ... vs Dharwad Distt. Khadi Gramudyog ...
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao, M B Shah
31 March, 2000·JUDGMENT 2000 (2) SCR 888 The following Order of the Court was delivered :The petitioner is a common carrier govered by the Carriers Act, 1865. It contends that under Section 14(l)(d) of the Consumers Protection Act, 1986 the Consumer Fora can direct payment of compensation to the consumer for loss ...
Supreme Court Of India
Hridaya Rangan Pd. Verma And Ors vs State Of Bihar And Anr
Judges: K T Thomas, D P Mohapatra
31 March, 2000·JUDGMENT 2000 (2) SCR 859 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.P. MOHAPATRA, J. Leave granted.The three appellants,'Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma, Manoranjan Prasad Verma and Rajiv Ranjan Prasad Verma are sons of Late Shri Kashi Nath Prasad Verma. They have three other brothers who are not dir...
Supreme Court Of India
M.C. Mehta vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, B Kirpal, V Khare
31 March, 2000·1. Faced with the situation that the Court is not inclined to make any change in its order dated 28th July, 1998, learned Additional Solicitor General submits that he shall file an appropriate application with proper undertakings giving a schedule of compliance and seeks to withdraw these applicatio...
Supreme Court Of India
Suresh Rai and Ors vs State Of Bihar
Judges: Y K Sadharwal, A P Misra
30 March, 2000·S.SAGHIR AHMAD, J. Enmity, undoubtedly, is a double-edged weapon; it may be a motive for commission of crime; it may also be a motive for false implication. If, as in the instant case, one edge of the weapon of enmity is blunt, it cannot be sharpened by the judicial process. The weapon of enmity in ...
Supreme Court Of India
Udhav (Dead) By L.Rs. And Anr. vs Pandharinath Kishanrao Tak And ...
Judges: S Majmudar, U Banerjee
30 March, 2000·JUDGMENT S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Some of the heirs of appellant No. 1 are served. There is no conflict of interest between the heirs of appellant No.1 and appellant No.2. Hence learned Counsel for appellant No.2 was heard in support of this appeal.2. In our view no case is made out for our interference ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.