Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Nirlon Synthetic Fibres and ...
Judges: B Kirpal, D Mohapatra
19 July, 2000·1. The point involved in this appeal is short though the amounts are heavy. Perhaps that is the reason which persuaded the Union of India to file the present appeal which, as we shall presently see, is devoid of merits.2. It appears that the demand of excise duty was raised against the respondent wh...
Supreme Court Of India
Gulamhussain Kutubuddin Maner vs Abdulrashid Abdulrajak Maner And ...
Judges: V Khare, S Variava
19 July, 2000·1. Kutubuddin Maner (hereinafter referred to as 'donor') owned property No. 1629 situate within the municipal limits of Ward No. 7 of Kohlapur town. The donor died on 19.12.1972 leaving behind four sons including the plaintiff-appellant and defendant No. 2, two daughters and his wife as his heirs. T...
Supreme Court Of India
Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. vs Employees' Provident Fund ...
Judges: S R Babu, S V Patil
19 July, 2000·1. In a proceeding under Section 7(A) of the Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, a determination had been made against the appellant that the appellant is liable to contribute towards certain class of persons who are covered under an agreement to transport sugarcane. Th...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise vs Rallis India Ltd.
Judges: B Kirpal, D Mohapatra
19 July, 2000·ORDER C.A. No. 1346/19911. The only question involved in this appeal is whether the application for refund which was filed by the respondent before the Excise Authority was within the prescribed period of limitation.2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the respondent was manufacturing Sodium Hydros...
Supreme Court Of India
The Management Of Bank Of Madura ... vs Dy Commissioner Of Labour, ...
Judges: S R Babu, S V Patil
19 July, 2000·1. The grievance in this appeal is that the termination order passed against respondent No. 2 has been wrongly upset by the appellate authority-respondent No. 1 under Section 41 of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act 1947 and that order has not been interfered with by the High Court either b...
Supreme Court Of India
Dhyan Singh And Ors. vs State Of Haryana And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
19 July, 2000·JUDGMENT G.B. Pattanaik and U.C. Banerjee, JJ.1. These appeals and the writ petition raised the common question as to whether the services rendered as an Adult Education Supervisor under a non-formal Education Scheme, evolved by the State of Haryana, can be counted for the purpose of granting pensio...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P. And Ors. vs Pratap Narain Chaddha And Ors.
Judges: M Rao, D Raju
19 July, 2000·ORDER M. Jagannadha Rao and Doraiswamy Raju, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. The civil appeal is preferred by the State of U.P. and others questioning the judgment of the High Court of Allahabad dated 24th May, 1999 in Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 11161 of 1997. The respondents (writ petitio...
Supreme Court Of India
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Jyotsna Jain (Smt) And Anr.
Judges: S Bharucha, M Shah, R Pal
19 July, 2000·1. The order under appeal was passed by a Division Bench of the High Court at Delhi. Thereby, a writ petition filed by the present appellant assailing the correctness of an order passed by the Additional District Judge Delhi was dismissed. The Additional District Judge had acted as the appellate aut...
Supreme Court Of India
Md. Aziz Alam And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
19 July, 2000·1. This appeal is directed against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Calcutta Bench, dismissing the claim of the appellants. The appellants applied for certain posts under the Railway Administration in the year 1984 and took up the written examination as well as the viva voce examinat...
Supreme Court Of India
Labishwar Manjhi vs Pran Manjhi And Ors.
Judges: A Mishra, N S Hegde
19 July, 2000·1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27th January, 1986, passed by the High Court whereby the second appeal of the respondent was allowed while setting aside the concurrent findings of the two courts below.3. The short facts ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.