Federation Of Bar Associations In Karnataka vs Union Of India
Judges: K T Thomas, M B Shah
24 July, 2000·CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 379 of 2000 PETITIONER:FEDERATION OF BAR ASSOCIATIONS IN KARNATAKA Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/07/2000 BENCH:K.T. THOMAS & M.B. SHAH JUDGMENT:THOMAS, J. L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J The demand for establishment of H...
Supreme Court Of India
Kancherla Madhusudhana Rao vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao, Doraiswamy Raju
24 July, 2000·ï»¿CASE NO.:Special Leave Petition (civil) 14890 of 1999 PETITIONER:KANCHERLA MADHUSUDHANA RAO RESPONDENT:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/07/2000 BENCH:M. JAGANNADHA RAO & DORAISWAMY RAJU JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 Supp(1) SCR 668 The following Order of the Court was delivered ;This is a Sp...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Patheje Bros Forgings & Stamping & Anr vs Icici Ltd & Ors
Judges: S P Bharucha J M B Shah J, Ruma Pal J
24 July, 2000·PETITIONER:M/S PATHEJE BROS. FORGINGS & STAMPING & ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:ICICI LTD & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 24/07/2000 BENCH:S.P. BHARUCHA. J, M.B. SHAH.J, & RUMA PAL J.JUDGMENT:Bharucha, J. L......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T...J The question in this appeal is whether Section 22 ...
Supreme Court Of India
Anthony vs Kc Ittoop And Sons And Others
Judges: D P Mohapatro, K T Thomas, R C Lahoti
21 July, 2000·PETITIONER: ANTHONY Vs.RESPONDENT:KC ITTOOP AND SONS AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/07/2000 BENCH:D.P.Mohapatro, K.T.Thomas, R.C.Lahoti JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T Thomas J. A dispute which constantlycaused many litigations to pro long in the past (whether a lease could be made by an unregistered in...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Sony India Ltd.
Judges: S Bharucha, R Pal
21 July, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The order under appeal has been passed by a Division Bench of the High Court at Delhi. It was reversed the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (Tri.) requiring the respondent before us to deposit a sum of Rupees twenty crores towards duty as a condi...
Supreme Court Of India
Shashi Gaur vs Nct Of Delhi And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
21 July, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether a teacher of a private school whose services stood terminated not as a measure of penalty but on account of the fact that he allegedly did not have the requisite qualification, could move the Delhi School...
Supreme Court Of India
H.V.P.N.L. vs Mahavir
Judges: M Rao, D Raju
21 July, 2000·1. In a number of cases coming up in appeal in this Court, we find that the State Consumer Disputes Redressal, Commission Haryana at Chandigarh is passing a standard order in the following terms:We have heard the Law Officer of the H.V.P.N. - appellant and have also perused the impugned order. We do...
Supreme Court Of India
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd vs State Bank Of India, Overseas Branch, Bombay
Judges: S Rajendra Babu J, S N Phukan J
21 July, 2000·PETITIONER:OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE BANK OF INDIA, OVERSEAS BRANCH, BOMBAY DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/07/2000 BENCH:S. Rajendra Babu, J. & S.N. Phukan, J.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. :Leave granted.This appeal arises out of a suit filed to enforce a Bank Guara...
Supreme Court Of India
Mohd. Shafi Pandow vs State Of JandK And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
20 July, 2000·1. Delay in filing rejoinder affidavit is condoned.2. This appeal is directed by grant of special leave against the judgment of the Division Bench of Jammu and Kashmir High Court at Srinagar in Letter Patent Appeal No. 14/1987. The dispute relates to the advertisement that was issued for filling up ...
Supreme Court Of India
Iti Ltd. vs K. Chandragupta and Anr.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
20 July, 2000·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing the L.P.A. filed by the employer against the judgment of the learned Single Judge.2. The respondent was an employee under the Indian Telephone Industries in Category-H in the pay-scale of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.