Mahesh Kumar Bhawsinghka vs State Of Delhi
Judges: K Thomas, M Shah
04 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is now facing prosecution along with another person for offences under Sections 120B, 468 and 477A of the Indian Penal Code besides some other offences. The amount alleged to have been embezzled would have crossed the staggering mark of one crore had it been added w...
Supreme Court Of India
Vivek Kumar vs State Of U.P.
Judges: K Thomas, M Shah
04 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We are told that the appellant is in jail from 4-4-98 in connection with offences under Sections 307 and 395 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. It is quite a long period that he has been in custody without commencing the trial. There is no need to detain him further ...
Supreme Court Of India
Pabitra Mohan Dash Etc. vs State Of Orissa And Ors.
Judges: G Pattanaik, B Agrawal
04 January, 2000·JUDGMENT Pattanaik, J.1. These two appeals are directed against a Special Bench judgment of the Orissa High Court dated 25th January, 1999. By the said judgment some of the directions contained in the earlier Full Bench decisions have been set aside. The appellants, who were Head Masters of differen...
Supreme Court Of India
Parasrampuria Synthetics Ltd. vs Ceat Financial Services Limited ...
Judges: A Anand, R Lahoti
04 January, 2000·ORDER ORDER A.S. Anand, CJI and R.C. Lahoti, J.1. Leave granted.2. The contesting respondent who is present on caveat has filed a counter affidavit. Learned Counsel appearing for the contesting respondent waives formal notice. Learned Counsel for the parties pray for the appeal to be taken up for he...
Supreme Court Of India
State Bank Of India vs Girish Chandra Das
Judges: S Majmudar, D Mohapatra
04 January, 2000·ORDER S.B. Majmudar, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Solicitor General in support of the appeals as well as learned Counsel for the sole respondent.3. In our view, when the matter was remanded by the High Court by the impugned order the entire question should have been kept open for deci...
Supreme Court Of India
Weston Components Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs, New Delhi
Judges: B N Kirpal, S Rajendra Babu
04 January, 2000·http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 7144 of 1999 PETITIONER:WESTON COMPONENTS LTD.RESPONDENT:COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/01/2000 BENCH:B.N. KIRPAL & S. RAJENDRA BABU JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 (1) SCR 26 The followin...
Supreme Court Of India
Rajneesh Aggarwal vs Amit J Bhalla
Judges: G B Pattanaikk, U C Banerjee
04 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 10-12 of 2001.Special Leave Petition (crl.) 3210-3212 of 1999 PETITIONER:RAJNEESH AGGARWAL Vs. RESPONDENT:AMIT J. BHALLA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/01/2000 BENCH:G.B.Pattanaikk, U.C.Banerjee JUDGMENT: L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J PATTANAIK,J.Leave ...
Supreme Court Of India
Union Of India And Ors vs Dudh Nath Prasad
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, S P Kurdukar
04 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 1387 of 1991 PETITIONER:UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RESPONDENT:DUDH NATH PRASAD.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/01/2000 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD & S.P. KURDUKAR JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 (1) SCR 1 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by S. SAGHIR AHMAD, J. Respondent is a member of the Indian A...
Supreme Court Of India
C Chandramohan vs Sengottaiyan ( Dead ) By Lrs & Ors
Judges: Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri
04 January, 2000·PETITIONER:C.CHANDRAMOHAN Vs. RESPONDENT:SENGOTTAIYAN (DEAD) BY LRS & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/01/2000 BENCH:Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI,J. Thesethree appeals, by special leav e, arise out of the common judgment of the High Court of Madras in C.R....
Supreme Court Of India
Mohd. Zameeruddin Siddiqui vs Executive Council, A.M.U. And ...
Judges: S Ahmed, D Wadhwa
04 January, 2000·ORDER S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. This Court by its order dated 26.04.1996 while disposing of the SLP(C) No.6266/96 had, inter alia, stated as under:However, we are informed that the petitioner has not been given the retiral benefits and he is not getting...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.