Wallace Flour Mills Co. Ltd. vs Montblanc Investment Pvt. Ltd. ...
Judges: S Majmudar, D Mohapatra
10 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant as well as learned Counsel for respondent No. 1, who is the only contesting respondent. Respondent No. 2, though mentioned as contesting respondent in the appeal, is an ex-arbitrator and is no longer a contesting respondent.3. Learn...
Supreme Court Of India
Food Corporation Of India, Karnal vs State Of Haryana And Ors.
Judges: S Ahmed, D Wadhwa
10 January, 2000·ORDER S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. We have also gone through various orders passed by this Court at the interim stage in other cases.3. Section 39(5) together with its first proviso of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act 1973 provides as under :...
Supreme Court Of India
Manorama Thampuratti vs C.K. Sujatha Thampuratti And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, D Mohapatra
10 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties finally with their consent.3. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that the High Court while deciding the second appeal has not kept in view the limited jurisdiction conferred on it under Section 100 of the CPC, nor has it fram...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Rajasthan And Ors. vs Khemraj And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, R Lahoti, N S Hegde
10 January, 2000·ORDER A.S. Anand, J.1. Leave granted.2. Though this case has a chequered history, but at this stage we are only concerned with an order made by the trial court on 21st January, 1997 on an application filed by the appellants under Section 65 of the Evidence Act to produce secondary evidence in respec...
Supreme Court Of India
Raj Laxmi Sharma vs Dilip Kumar Sharma
Judges: S Bharucha, V Khare, S S Quadri
10 January, 2000·ORDER S.P. Bharucha, J.1. This is a wife's petition to transfer the suit for dissolution of marriage filed by the husband against her in the court of the Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi to Agra. It is the case of the wife that she stays with her father in Agra along with the two sons of the marriage, wh...
Supreme Court Of India
K. Ayya Thayalnayagiammal vs T.V. Thomas
Judges: B Kirpal, S R Babu
10 January, 2000·JUDGMENT B.N. Kirpal, J.1. Special leave granted.2. The Appellant had on 24th June, 1993 filed a suit for eviction of the Respondent from the demised premises. The summons were received by the Respondent and he appeared in court on 25th July, 1993. Thereafter neither the written statement was filed,...
Supreme Court Of India
Satya Brat Gain vs State Of Bihar
Judges: K Thomas, M Shah
10 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. In the light of the report submitted by the trial Judge as well as by the Director General and I.G. Police, Patna (Bihar) we do not see any reasonable prospect of the trial against the appellant registering substantial progress in the future. It is already 5 years passed since ap...
Supreme Court Of India
Som Dutt (Dead) By L.Rs. vs Govind Ram
Judges: B Kirpal, S R Babu
10 January, 2000·JUDGMENT B.N. Kirpal, J.1. Special leave granted.2. A suit for eviction was filed by the appellant on 13th November, 1969 against the tenants. One of the tenants was Bishandas (defendant No. 2), the father of respondent. It appears that the suit was decreed in 1975 by the trial court on the ground o...
Supreme Court Of India
Rosy And Anr vs State Of Kerala And Ors
Judges: K T Thomas, M B Shah
10 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 18-19 of 2000 PETITIONER:ROSY AND ANR.RESPONDENT:STATE OF KERALA AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/01/2000 BENCH:K.T. THOMAS & M.B. SHAH JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 (1) SCR 107 The Judgments of the Court were delivered by SHAH, J. Leave granted These appeals by special leave are filed ...
Supreme Court Of India
Bihar State Electricity Board vs Prabha Aggarwal And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, D Mohapatra
10 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant, the acquiring body as well as the learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 who are the real contesting respondents. State of Bihar which is respondent No. 3 is deemed to have been served as 30 days from the date of issuance of n...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.