Kuppan And Ors. vs State Of Tamil Nadu
Judges: K Thomas, A Misra
24 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. In this case three appellants have been convicted and sentenced to different terms of imprisonment of offences under Sections 326, 324 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code. In appeal the conviction and sentences were confirmed but in revision the sentence was reduced to imprisonment ...
Supreme Court Of India
News Item "Hindustan Times" ... vs Central Pollution Control Board ...
Judges: B Kirpal, S R Babu
24 January, 2000·1. Affidavit of the Chief Secretary has been filed which seems to indicate that orders which were passed by us earlier directing that the pollution of the river Yamuna should be stopped with effect from 1st November, 1999 have not been complied with. This is so especially in view of the Report which...
Supreme Court Of India
C.D. Security Services Network ... vs Union Of India And Anr.
Judges: A, R Lahoti
24 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. On 13th October, 1999 while condoning delay, notice was issued in the Special Leave Petition and it was directed that the notice shall indicate that the respondents may show cause why the matter may not be remanded to the High Court for proper disposal in accordance with law.3. L...
Supreme Court Of India
Wel. Commr. Employees ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: B Kirpal, V Khare
22 January, 2000·1. Delay condoned.2. There can be no question of regularisation of its employees in a temporary department which has been created to meet a particular contingency, hopefully to a distant future.3. Special leave petition is dismissed....
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Maharashtra And Ors vs Nanded Parbhani Z L B M V, Operator Sangh
Judges: G B Pattanaik, U C Banerjee
21 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 74 of 2000 PETITIONER:STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.RESPONDENT:NANDED PARBHANI Z.L.B.M.V., OPERATOR SANGH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/01/2000 BENCH:G.B. PATTANAIK & U.C. BANERJEE JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 (1) SCR 357 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by PATTANAIK, J. Leaved granted...
Supreme Court Of India
Ambika Prasad And Another vs State ( Delhi Administration, Delhi )
Judges: G B Patnaik, M B Shah
21 January, 2000·PETITIONER:AMBIKA PRASAD AND ANOTHER Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE (DELHI ADMINISTRATION, DELHI) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 21/01/2000 BENCH:G.B.Patnaik, M.B.Shah JUDGMENT:Shah,J.These appeals are filed against the judgment and order dated 21.3.1997 passed by the High Court of Delhi dismissing Criminal Appeals No.4...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of U.P. vs Chhuttan And Ors.
Judges: G Nanavati, U Banerjee
21 January, 2000·ORDER G.T. Nanavati, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. The only point that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the notice under Section 8(3) of the Urban Land and (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 was validly served upon the respondent who is the holder of ...
Supreme Court Of India
Ali Jawad Ameerhasan Rizvi vs Indo-French Biotech Enterprises ...
Judges: G Pattanaik, R Lahoti
21 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The High Court of Bombay having dismissed the writ petition filed and having levied a cost of Rs. 1 lac on the first petitioner, the petitioner is in appeal by way of special leave petition.3. When the matter came up before this Court, a limited notice was issued with regard to t...
Supreme Court Of India
Ankush Keshav Bowlekar vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, S Quadri, M Shah
21 January, 2000·1. Leave Granted2. It is unnecessary to go in great detail in this matter. The High Court based its order on a notice which, as it has itself found, was neither signed nor dated nor bore the requisite seal. The rules required that the notice must be issued as provided in the CPC. Clearly, that was n...
Supreme Court Of India
Ranbir Singh vs Satbiro Devi And Ors.
Judges: S Bharucha, S Quadri, M Shah
21 January, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The notice on the special leave petition stated that the matter might be disposed of at this stage by modifying the Order of stay granted by the High Court so that it operates only for the period of term of the Sarpanch.3. Service is complete but the first respondent does not app...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.