The Chairman, Railway Board & Ors vs Mrs Chandrima Das & Ors
Judges: R P Sethi, S Saghir Ahmad
28 January, 2000·PETITIONER:THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:MRS. CHANDRIMA DAS & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/01/2000 BENCH:R.P.Sethi, S.Saghir Ahmad JUDGMENT:S.SAGHIR AHMAD, J.Leave granted.Mrs. Chandrima Das, a practising advocate of the Calcutta High Court, filed a petition under Article 226 of th...
Supreme Court Of India
Chairman, J&K State Board Of Education vs Feyaz Ahmed Malik & Ors
Judges: D P Mohapatro, M Jagannadha Rao
28 January, 2000·PETITIONER:CHAIRMAN, J&K STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Vs. RESPONDENT:FEYAZ AHMED MALIK & ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/01/2000 BENCH:D.P.Mohapatro, M.Jagannadha Rao JUDGMENT:MOHAPATRA,J.Feeling concerned about the menace of mass copying in examinations the Jammu and Kashmir State Board of School Education ...
Supreme Court Of India
Nedungadi Bank Ltd vs K P Madhavankutty And Ors
Judges: S Saghir Ahmad, D P Wadhwa
28 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 638 of 2000 PETITIONER:NEDUNGADI BANK LTD.RESPONDENT:K.P. MADHAVANKUTTY AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/01/2000 BENCH:S. SAGHIR AHMAD & D.P. WADHWA JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 (1) SCR 459 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by D.P, WABHWA, J. Leave panted.The Nedungadi bank Ltd....
Supreme Court Of India
Parents Association And Anr vs Union Of India And Ors
Judges: V N Khare, M J Rao
28 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Writ Petition (civil) 418 of 1996 PETITIONER:PARENTS ASSOCIATION AND ANR. ..Vs. RESPONDENT:UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/01/2000 BENCH:V.N.Khare, M.J.Rao JUDGMENT: L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J.This writ petition is filed by t...
Supreme Court Of India
Gangula Ashok And Anr vs State Of Andhra Pradesh
Judges: K T Thomas, M B Shah
28 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 94 of 2000 PETITIONER:GANGULA ASHOK AND ANR.RESPONDENT:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/01/2000 BENCH:K.T. THOMAS & M.B.SHAH JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT 2000 (1) SCR 468 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by THOMAS, J. Leave granted.Can a "special court" which is envisa...
Supreme Court Of India
Mool Chand vs Kedar ( Deceased ) By Lrs & Ors
Judges: A P Misra, M J Rao
28 January, 2000·CASE NO.:Special Leave Petition (civil) 11069 of 1998 PETITIONER:MOOL CHAND Vs. RESPONDENT:KEDAR (DECEASED) BY LRS. & ORS. .. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/01/2000 BENCH:A.P.Misra, M.J.Rao JUDGMENT:J U D G E M E N T MISRA, J.L.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J Leave granted.The short q...
Supreme Court Of India
Rameshwari Devi vs State Of Bihar And Others
Judges: D P Wadhawal, S N Phukan
27 January, 2000·PETITIONER:RAMESHWARI DEVI Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/01/2000 BENCH:D.P.Wadhawal, S.N.Phukan JUDGMENT:D.P. Wadhwa, J. Leave granted.Appellant is aggrieved by judgment dated April 23, 1998 of the Division Bench of the Patna High Court passed in Letters Patent Appe...
Supreme Court Of India
Additional Collector Of Central ... vs Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd., Etc.
Judges: S Bharucha, A Mishra, N S Hegde
27 January, 2000·JUDGMENT S.P. Bharucha, A.P. Mishra and N. Santosh Hegde, JJ.1. This is an appeal against an order of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Tribunal. The Tribunal followed the judgment of this Court in Philips India Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Pune in coming to its conclusion.2. We find tha...
Supreme Court Of India
Dev Dutta And Ors. vs Sohan Lal And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, V Khare
27 January, 2000·ORDER S.B. Majmudar, J.1. There is no question of interference under Article 136 of the Constitution in this Special Leave Petition against the order of the High Court by which the trial court is directed to decide the restitution application under Section 144 C.P.C. at the earliest. When we asked l...
Supreme Court Of India
Maratt Rubber Ltd. vs J.K. Marattukalam
Judges: G Pattanaik, R Sethi
27 January, 2000·1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of Karanataka High Court quashing a criminal proceeding instituted by the complainant-Company alleging that the accused-respondent, who was former Director of the Company committed offence under Section 630 of the Indian Companies Act by continuing to ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.