Ram Rakha vs State Of Punjab
Judges: G Nanavati, Y Sabharwal
09 February, 2000·ORDER G.T. Nanavati and Y.K. Sabharwal, JJ.1. The Appellant and one Shinder Singh have been convicted by he Designated Court, Ferozepur at Bhatinda in TADA File No. 81 of 16.4.93 for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC and Section 3 of Terrorist and disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act. F...
Supreme Court Of India
Haji Mumtaz Hussain (Dead) ... vs State Of U.P.
Judges: A Anand, S R Babu, D Raju
09 February, 2000·1. The appellant filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 40,000/- by way of damages on the ground that he had purchased 171 shisham trees in the area lying between the rivers Dhimri and Baur at an auction sale conducted by the Agricultural Officer, Colonization scheme by name Shri J.P. Nathani, D.W. 6, on ...
Supreme Court Of India
Banaras Hindu University And Ors. vs Mahendra Kumar Gupta And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, S R Babu, D Raju
09 February, 2000·ORDER Dr. A.S. Anand, C.J.1. The writ petition filed by the Respondents seeking a direction for admission to the M.B.B.S. course was allowed by the learned Single Judge and the University's appeal against that order failed before the Division Bench. A direction had been given by the learned Single J...
Supreme Court Of India
Collector Of Central Excise, ... vs Lml Ltd. (Scooter Unit), Kanpur
Judges: B Kirpal, M Shah
09 February, 2000·1. The respondent manufactures scooters in the State of U.P. which are sold throughout India. The question which arises for consideration in these appeals relates to the applicability of Rule 6(a) of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 1975 to such sales for the purpose of determining the value of...
Supreme Court Of India
N.D.M.C. vs Sohan Lal Sachdev (Dead) ...
Judges: S Majmudar, D Mohapatra
09 February, 2000·JUDGMENT D.P. Mohapatra, J.1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. The core question that arises for determination in this case is whether use of premises for the purpose of a guest house can be termed as 'dorrtestic use' for the purpose of electricity charges by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC)?3...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of A.P. vs A.P. State Road Transport ...
Judges: B Kirpal, M Shah
09 February, 2000·ORDER B.N. Kirpal and M.B. Shah, JJ.1. On 29th September, 1999, a Constitution Bench of this Court took note of the fact that the present dispute is between the State of Andhra Pradesh and its wholly owned Respondent-Corporation. The question involved is whether sale by the Respondent of old tyres, ...
Supreme Court Of India
M. Thomas Alias Joyi vs State Of Kerala
Judges: G Nanavati, Y Sabharwal
09 February, 2000·1. The Appellant was tried for the offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C. for causing death of Babu. The trial court acquitted him on the ground that the evidence of P.Ws. 1 & 2, who claimed to be the eye-witnesses, was highly improbable. The trial court did not believe the evidence of P.Ws 3 &...
Supreme Court Of India
Kaluram vs Shrinathdas And Ors.
Judges: B Kirpal, M Shah
09 February, 2000·ORDER B.N. Kirpal, J.1. This is an appeal by special leave from the judgment of the High Court who reversed the concurrent finding of fact arrived at by the trial court and the lower appellate Court and held that the appellant has not been able to prove its title to the suit land.2. The case of the ...
Supreme Court Of India
Cheeranthoodika Ahmmedkutty And Anr vs Parambur Mariakutty Umma And Others
Judges: K T Thomas, D P Mohapatra
08 February, 2000·PETITIONER:CHEERANTHOODIKA AHMMEDKUTTY AND ANR.Vs. RESPONDENT:PARAMBUR MARIAKUTTY UMMA AND OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2000 BENCH:K.T. Thomas & D.P. Mohapatra JUDGMENT:Appeal (civil) 3067 of Thomas J.L...I...T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J Though the appellants in these two ap...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. Raj Rani vs State (Delhi Administration)
Judges: K Thomas, D Mohapatra
08 February, 2000·1. Appellant is Smt. Raj Rani whose brother Shashi Pal Malhotra had married one Veena in the year 1978. The said Veena committed suicide on 17-4-1984 after leaving a suicide note. The case was charge-sheeted against the appellant, her brother and her mother for the offence under Section 306 read wit...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.