R. Annapurna vs Ramadugu Anantha Krishna Sastry ...
Judges: K Thomas, R Sethi
09 August, 2000·1. We have considered the explanation for the delay. Though the delay is apparently very long it has been sufficiently explained. We accept the explanation and condone the delay.2. Leave granted.3. The order impugned in this appeal has been passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Prad...
Supreme Court Of India
A.P. State Financial Corporation vs Official Liquidator
Judges: S R Babu, S Phukan
09 August, 2000·JUDGMENT S.N. Phukan, J.1. The appellant is a Corporation established under The State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (for short 'Act of 1951'). Two companies viz. M/S Nagarjuna Paper Mills and M/S Chandra Pharmaceuticals Limited were in liquidation and the liquidation proceedings were pending befo...
Supreme Court Of India
Rosammal Issetheenammal Fernandez ( Dead ) By Lrs & Ors vs Joosa Mariyan Fernandez & Ors
Judges: A P Misra, Y K Sabharwal
09 August, 2000·PETITIONER:ROSAMMAL ISSETHEENAMMAL FERNANDEZ (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS.Vs. RESPONDENT:JOOSA MARIYAN FERNANDEZ & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/2000 BENCH:A.P.Misra, Y.K.Sabharwal JUDGMENT: DER Heard learned counsel for the parties.The short question raised is, whether the High Court was right to entertai...
Supreme Court Of India
M/S Jay Bharat Credit And Investment Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner Of Sales-Tax & Anr
Judges: B N Kirpal J S N Phukan J, Ruma Pal J
09 August, 2000·PETITIONER:M/S. JAY BHARAT CREDIT AND INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.Vs. RESPONDENT:COMMISSIONER OF SALES-TAX & ANR. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/2000 BENCH:B.N.KIRPAL, J., S.N. PHUKAN. J., & RUMA PAL. J.JUDGMENT:KIRPAL, J. L.........I.....T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. J The only question which aris...
Supreme Court Of India
Life Insurance Corporation Of India And Others vs Jyotish Chandra Biswas
Judges: S Rajendra Babu J, Shivaraj V Patil J
09 August, 2000·PETITIONER:LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:JYOTISH CHANDRA BISWAS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/2000 BENCH:S. RAjendra Babu J. & Shivaraj V. Patil J.JUDGMENT:Shivaraj V. Patil,J. L.......I.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T.J Leave sought for is granted. The Life ...
Supreme Court Of India
Bharat Earth Movers vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnataka
Judges: N S Hegde, R C Lahoti, S P Bharucha
09 August, 2000·PETITIONER:BHARAT EARTH MOVERS Vs. RESPONDENT:COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARNATAKA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/2000 BENCH:N.S.Hegde, R.C.Lahoti, S.P.Bharucha JUDGMENT:R.C. Lahoti, J.Relevant to the assessment year 1978-1979 the following question of law was stated, at the instance of the Revenue, ...
Supreme Court Of India
State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Polamala Raju & Rajarao
Judges: R C Lahoti, K G Balakrishnan
09 August, 2000·PETITIONER:STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. RESPONDENT:POLAMALA RAJU & RAJARAO DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/08/2000 BENCH:R.C.Lahoti, K.G.Balakrishnan JUDGMENT: JudgementL.....I.........T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J A little girl of five years of age was ravished by the respondent on 4th January, 19...
Supreme Court Of India
Sarabjit Singh vs Ex Major B D Gupta & Others
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao J, Doraiswamy Raju J
09 August, 2000·PETITIONER:SARABJIT SINGH Vs. RESPONDENT:EX. MAJOR B.D.GUPTA & OTHERS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/00/2000 BENCH:M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J. & DORAISWAMY RAJU, J.JUDGMENT: L.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T.......T. T..J M.JAGANNADHA RAO,J.Leave granted.The appellant Mr.Sarabjit Singh (2nd respondent i...
Supreme Court Of India
Executive Engineer, Shimla ... vs Presiding Officer, H.P. Labour ...
Judges: S Majmudar, M Shah
09 August, 2000·1. Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, we do not think on the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, that any interference is called for in the present proceedings under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.2. Respondent No. 2 who was admittedly sent for apprenticeship training ...
Supreme Court Of India
Pinakin Bhailal Amin vs Haresh Manibhai Patel And Ors.
Judges: A Anand, R Lahoti, K Balakrishnan
09 August, 2000·1. Shri Haresh M. Patel, the appellant in Civil Appeal No. 2145 of 1993, is the plaintiff in Suit No. 433 of 1969, a partition suit pending in the Bombay High Court. Shri. Pinakin Bhallal Amin (of M/s. B. Amin & Co.) the appellant in Civil Appeal Nos. 9312-9313 of 1994, is an advocate and solicitor ...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.