P.K. Das vs The Presiding Officer, Labour ...
Judges: Y Sabharwal
13 April, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the Appellant and learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2. Respondent No.1 is a proforma party.3. The short question is when by an earlier order of the High Court a view was taken by the Division Bench after hearing the parties that the punishment o...
Supreme Court Of India
Smt. V. Mangaleswari vs V. Balakrishna Reddy And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, Y Sabharwal
13 April, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel for the Appellant and learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3 - the Insurance Company which is the main contesting party finally in this appeal.3. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case as the claimant because of the motor accident has lost ...
Supreme Court Of India
Karnataka State Road Transport ... vs Asmathunnisa (Smt) And Ors.
Judges: S Majmudar, Y Sabharwal
13 April, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. A limited notice was issued on 3.2.1997 to the Respondents as under:Issue notice for final disposal on the application for condonation of delay and on Special Leave Petition to show cause why the matter be not remanded to the High Court for a fresh decision of the appeal on merit...
Supreme Court Of India
Steel Authority Of India Ltd. vs Ranchi Municipal Corpn. And Ors.
Judges: A Mishra, D Mohapatra
13 April, 2000·ORDER A.P. Misra, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. The Appellant has challenged the order passed by the High Court dated 13th January, 1999 whereby the review application was dismissed holding that the order passed by the High Court, which was sought to be reviewed, mer...
Supreme Court Of India
Fali Firoz Shah Bomanji vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Judges: A Mishra, D Mohapatra
13 April, 2000·ORDER A.P. Misra, J.1. Leave granted.2. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.3. The Appellant has challenged the order of the High Court dated 4th August, 1998 dismissing the writ petition filed by the Appellant rejecting the claim of the Appellant that he is the title holder of the land in questio...
Supreme Court Of India
Avinash Arora And Ors. vs State Of U.T. Chandigarh And Anr.
Judges: G Pattanaik, U Banerjee
13 April, 2000·1. Leave granted.2. The appellants have been alleged to have committed offence under Sections 420, 406, 468, 467, 471 and 120B, I.P.C. On an application being filed under Section 438 of the CrPC, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail, subject to deposit Rs. 10 crores. The ap...
Supreme Court Of India
Dai-Ichi Karnataka Ltd vs Union Of India and Ors
Judges: R C Lahoti, S R Babu
11 April, 2000·RAJENDRA BABU, J. :By Notification No. 210/82 dated September 10, 1982 (as amended by Public Notice dated September 20, 1983) issued under Section 25(i) of the Customs Act the Government of India exempted from payment of customs duty and additional duty of customs on all raw materials and components...
Supreme Court Of India
Gayatri Devi Pansari vs State Of Orissa and Ors
Judges: S S Ahmad, Doraswami Raju
11 April, 2000·Raju, J.Special leave granted.The appellant herein was selected to open a 24 hours Medical Store in the Campus of Sub-divisional Hospital, Patnagarh, District Bolangir, Orissa, pursuant to the advertisement made by the Government of Orissa published on 12.10.96 inviting applications from the unemplo...
Supreme Court Of India
Jaya Gokul Educational Trust vs Commnr. and Secy. Government Higher ...
Judges: M Jagannadha Rao, M B Shah
11 April, 2000·JUDGMENT 2000 (2) SCR 1234 The following Judgment/Order of the Court was delivered :M. JAGANNADHA RAO, J. Leave granted.The appellant is a trust which wanted to establish a self-financing Engineering College and submitted an application during 1994-95 to the University of Kerala as well as to All In...
Supreme Court Of India
Indian Council For Envirolegal ... vs Union Of India and Ors.
Judges: A Mishra, N S Hegde
11 April, 2000·1. This Court on 27th of July, 1999 while considering l.A. Nos. 2 & 17 directed that the copies of the above I.A. shall be served on all the parties by the counsel for the applicant. The contesting respondents have filed the counter affidavit opposing the said application. On the said date, this Cou...
Supreme Court Of India
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.